Laserfiche WebLink
, _ "~y~;+. °.y.-~Y~~~~q(`~~~. tnf I~^ ~''~"~'~s~ ,.+w_3µ <br />((y'~~' 1 . fin(, ~''~b I1Mr VW "1~'. a~~.1 /Y'~.- <br />ERFOUR ~ ~' ((TT'- Environmental Conseuuences <br />r ~~ <br />ring of water levels in the wells surrounding the mine panel and within the mine °''~0~~ °"~-~ <br />~ ~~, <br />'son of water levels to attempt to determine if gradients have been influenced by fluidt ~y ~- <br />the well. ~ ~~ <br />• ampling of the neazby upgradient and downgradient wells in the zone where well integrity ~ '~,.,^%r <br />_~ <br />failure is suspected. }-~- <br />• Comparison of the groundwater analytical data from the baseline and well failure sampling. <br />• Should indications of a failure exist, a monitoring well should be drilled and installed into the <br />impacted zone. If elevated TDS levels are detected, then delineation of the impacts and p/`~~; -~ <br />mitigation of these impacts should be initiated. o c=" <br />The current monitoring plan proposed by American Soda has six of the ten monitoring wells ~^ r, <br />r y~ <br />located in the fast 5-yeaz mining panel (Figure 2-10). No wells az currently I , ~~ ~,• _,,,. <br />downgadient outride the first 5- ear mining panel our wells are located outside the first ~ / °/ Z <br />mining panel. Two of these wells, 19-2 and 2 - ,are located cross-gradient to the panel witltm J '- ' <br />the A-Groove and the Uinta Formation, respectively. We1129-2 is located upgradient of the a <br />panel and is screened at the Dissolution Surface, while we1121-2 is an alluvial monitoring well. ~ ~° Dy <br />None of the wells aze currently co-located. p8`" v' . <br />Additional monitoring is necessary under the action alternatives. To provide adequate detection c,.h' ~ i" _ q <br />of potential loss of production fluids and to determine vertical components of the hydraulic ~ y -rY~ <br />gradient, a network of nested or co-located monitoring wells would be necessary. These wells ~'' . -~ <br />should consist of installations in the Uinta Formation, A-Groove, B-Groove and Dissolution ~ ~_~'~ <br />Surface at one upgradient, two downgradient, and two cross-gradient locations of the first mining 1. <br />panel. To determine the baseline conditions for the aquifers, monitoring of the wells should be <br />undertaken monthly over a 6-month period prior to any mining activity. The monitoring should <br />l+- <br />take place for the pazameters listed in the Mine Plan. Monthly results obtained should be ~a-µ' <br />compazed to the statistical means of the baseline parameter period, and criteria set for further Asa- <br />investigation based upon exceedances. This effort should also be undertaken at each mine pane( / , <br />prior to mining that panel. These efforts should be performed under either action alternative. ~yt : ~ <br />However, the cross-gradient wells may not be necessary except at the first mine panel, de~'ending ~ ~ <br />on what is learned about potential groundwater flow and groundwater quality impacts from the o~"'' ' ~~~.+ (~ <br />initial mining panel. oI~ r'`~~o <br />A potential mitigation measure that could be undertaken as a result of the loss of production fluid ~~~' <br />and the subsequent elevation of TDS in any of the aquifers, would be the installation of <br />extraction wells in the impacted zone and the subsequent recovery of elevated TDS water. This <br />action would apply to either of the action alternatives, if a release of production fluid were to <br />occur. <br />The evaporation ponds at both sites also have the potential to release elevated-TDS fluids into <br />the envirorunent in the event of a liner failure. These ponds should also have periodic inventory <br />and measurement of the fluids to determine the potential for loss. In addition, monitoring wells <br />should be installed at both locations to determine if fluids containing elevated TDS <br />concentrations have been released from these facilities. <br />Groundwater 417 <br />j. <br />