My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE134580
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE134580
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:35:16 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 2:28:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999002
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/4/1999
Doc Name
COPY SENT TO DMG OF BOB TOBINS WATER QUALITY CONCERNS
From
ROBERT TOBIN
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CNAPTERTHREE <br />3.4 GROUNDWATER <br />Groundwater resources aze <br />presentation. <br />3.4.1 Regional Hydrogeology <br />Affected Environment <br />basis followed by asite-specific <br />The discussion of regional bedrock hydrogeology focuses primarily on the Piceance Site since no <br />mining or other intrusions to bedrock would occur along the pipeline corridor or at the Pazachute •~ „-, <br />$iie. C,n 1~~3 +~,aet ~ ~~~ <br />t ,11 -.+I.an ~ w <br />PS~~~"~~o5 ~~]SM L <br />3.4.1.1 Aquifer Description <br />The principal water-bearing bedrock units within the Piceance Creek Basin include the Uinta and <br />Green River Formations which aze both of Tertiary age. The underlying Wasatch Formation <br />consists oflow-permeability clays, shales, and lenticulaz sandstone and forms an aquitard in the <br />study azea. Alluvial sediments found within major drainages can provide a locally important <br />source of groundwater. Groundwater reserves in the Piceance Creek Basin aze Iazge in both azeal <br />extent and volume. The aquifer systems described below extend over 700 squaze miles (derived <br />from Robson and Saulnier 1980). The fora! estimated groundwater reserves aze estimated at 25 <br />million acre-feet (BLM 1983), with over 2.5 million acre-feet in the Lower Aquifer (Coffin et al. <br />1971). Other estimates of groundwater storage volume are even higher. <br />The groundwater system within the basin is typically divided into three aquifers: (1) Alluvial <br />Aquifer, (2) Upper Aquifer, and (3) Lower Aquifer (Weeks and Welder 1974). This subdivision <br />is based on hydraulic and water chemistry chazactetistics. Each of the aquifers, along with the <br />semi-confining Mahogany Zone, which separates the Upper and Lower Aquifers. is discussed <br />below. <br />The Alluvial Aquifer, comprised of unconsolidated sand, gravel, silt, and clay derived from <br />weathering of the Uinta Formation, occurs in valley bottoms along the creeks. The sattrated <br />thickness of this aquifer is variable, ranging from a few feet up to 100 feet as reported by Weeks <br />and Welder (1974) for a well ]ocation along the lower reaches of Piceance Creek. Weeks and <br />Welder { 1974) reported that high pumping rates (e.g., 1,500 gpm) can initially be obtained from <br />alluvial aquifer wells at some locations within the basin: however, the high rates can be sustained <br />for only a short duration because of the limited extent of the aquifer. Groundwater can occur <br />under unconfined or semi-confined conditions within the Alluvial Aquifer. ~ <br />The Upper Aquifer coasists of fractured, lean oil shale of the Parachute Creek Member of the ~r' <br />Green River Formation above the Mahogany Zone and sandstone, siltstone and fractured ~,~" <br />mazlstone of the saturated portion of the overlying Uinta Formation (Figure 3.1-4}. ~ ~ ~ <br />Primary porosity of materials within the Upper Aquifer is generally low, but permeability is y <br />enhanced by secondary features such as fractures, faults, joints, and solution cavities. Weeks and <br />Welder (1974) reported that the primary porosity of sandstone an siltstone beds within the Uinta <br />Formation is typically very low due to precipitation of cements from percolating water. <br />However, the marlstones within the formation typically conduct waxer much more readily due to <br />Groundwater 3-15 <br />.ti• <br />L. <br />~~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.