Laserfiche WebLink
NOV-09-2001 FRI 08:41 AM BANK~ND GESSO LLC FAX N0. 3034 8329 P, 06 <br />fora 2-loot drop in water level to initiate a mitigation plan, and is this water level drop <br />agreeable to the Water Ski Club. In order to implement this plan, the applicant will need <br />to provide to the Division the seasonal elevations of the water ski lake. Please address <br />accordingly. <br />USGS studies indicate that, in the area of the water ski club, unconsolidated <br />groundwater has a saturated thickness of 10 to 20 feet. The ski club states that water <br />depths in its pond are generally between 10 and 40 feet except in the westernmost 5 <br />e o , w ere water ep is eat or less. A 2 toot decrease thus <br />represents a 5 to 20 percent change in most of the 23 acre pond and was selected <br />initially as a trigger for mitigative steps, because any smaller deviation will be very <br />difficult to discern, in light of the several factors contributing to fluctuating groundwater <br />elevations - permeahle soils, high hydraulic conductivity, seasonal effects, effects of <br />other mining, irrigation, and well usage in the area. In discussions with the Water Ski <br />Club, the applicant has subsequently agreed to a 0.5 foot decrease in pond surface <br />Tom Krueger; the Ski Club Manager, reports that at least one Glub member desves <br />mitigative steps to occur, when something less than a 0.5 foot decrease is noted. The <br />Water Ski Club has not suggested a method for discerning when such a decrease would <br />be attributable to mining activity. <br />As stated, water levels in the water ski pond will <br />be <br />All groundwater monitoring data will be summarized and submitted to the Division on a <br />quarterly basis, beginning at the time that monitoring begins and ending when <br />monitoring is discontinued, fifteen months after reclamation has been completed. <br />• The applicant will need to commit to submitting one of the specific mitigation plans <br />mentioned in the form of a technical revision to the permit in the event such measures <br />are required for mitigation of the groundwater wells and/or water ski pond. <br />The comment is acknowledged. And, based on recent discussions with the Water Ski <br />Club, the applicant would like to add another possible mitigative means to the previously <br />mentioned alternatives for responding to decreasing ski pond levels - to add water to the <br />ski pond from sources other than the water storage reservoir, which are_of_acceptabls: <br />. The applicant proposed an interim mitigation plan for impacts to the surrounding wells. <br />Please explain if there are any long-term mitigation plans addressing impacts to the <br />surrounding wells. <br />Because of high permeability and hydraulic conductivity of local soils, the applicant <br />believes that groundwater will rapidly re-attain its current elevations. Only in the <br />immediate area downgradient of the mine is a shadow of, perhaps, a one foot loss in <br />ground water elevation expected to linger for a year or two following completion of the <br />liner. Worst case effects will be seen during and immediately following dewatering <br />activity, and current conditions will be re-attained relatively quickly thereafter. Thus, the <br />applicant is not proposing long term mitigation steps. If replacement water is necessary <br />