My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE134483
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE134483
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:35:11 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 2:22:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981022
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
D-SEAM AREA SLOPE STABILITY (ELK CREEK MINE ABEL 1998)
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 2.05-E2 Part 5
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JOHN F. ABEL, JR. 3~aLOOKOUrvlEwcouRr <br />MINING ENGINEER GOLDEN, CO 80401 <br />• ]01279.4801 <br />F!~(278.818~ <br />JF4BELQCompu54M.mm <br />October 19, 1998 <br />Mr. Tom Anderson <br />Oxbow Mining Inc. <br />P.O. Box 535 <br />Somerset, CO 81434 <br />REFERENCE: "D" Seam portal area slope stability <br />Dear Tom: <br />The stability of the slide mass above and to the west of the <br />"D" Seam portal area in the Elk Creek drainage will be improved by <br />excavating the portion of slide material shown on the portal area <br />plan map and indicated between the "1976 Ground Surface" and the <br />"Cut Surface" on Section 7300 (Figure 1) and on Section 7450 <br />(Figure 2). Excavating the indicated parts of the slide mass <br />increases the preliminary calculated factors of safety for all <br />• Roman numeral indicated cut slope segments (slices) along the <br />potential sliding surfaces. The increased stability is primarily <br />the result of reducing the weight of overlying slide rock, as shown <br />on Tables 1 and 2. The planned fill, shown at the slide mass toes <br />of the two cross sections, provides an additional minor increase in <br />the slide resisting forces. The thrust components along the poten- <br />tial slide surface, tending to drive the slide mass in each slope <br />segment to failure, are reduced more than the normal component <br />across the potential slide surface, providing proportionally more <br />frictional resistance to further downslope movement. The cohesive <br />resistance along the potential sliding surface was assumed to be <br />constant, i.e. independent of the shape of the overlying ground <br />surface, because cohesion is shear resistance under no normal load. <br />The planned cutting and filling of the slide mass above the <br />"D" Seam portal area applies the two traditional methods of stabi- <br />lizing a moving soil or rock slope, <br />1) removal of slide material from the crest of the slope and <br />2) buttressing (loading) the toe of the slope. <br />Figure 3, modified from Golder (1971), demonstrates one similar <br />previous instance of slope stabilization by applying these methods, <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.