Laserfiche WebLink
• Herbaceous Production <br />Results of herbaceous production sampling in the oakbrush vegetation community aze <br />presented in Table 3. Mean total herbaceous production of the sampled quadrats on the <br />study azea was 84.4 g/m2 (752.3 lb/ac). Herbaceous production quadrat weights were <br />highly variable, with the standazd deviation being 50 percent of the value of the <br />herbaceous production mean. When plotted, the herbaceous production values illustrate <br />a very broad, flat normal distribution. Savage and Savage (1996) noted a highly <br />variable distribution for total herbaceous production within adjacent oakbrush stands at <br />the West Elk Mine, and attributed the production variability to canopy density, which <br />limited available sunlight to the understory. This also appears to be true in this <br />oakbrush community location. <br />Woody Plant Density <br />Woody plant density in the oakbrush community was dominated by five species. (Table <br />4). One species predominated in the canopy, Quercus gambelii. Quercus gambeiii <br />accounted for 31.8 percent of all woody plants with 123.26 individuals per 100 square <br />meter (4988 per acre). The remaining dominant species were found in the mid-level <br />stratum. In descending order, Symphoricarpos rotundifolius accounted for 103.48 <br />individuals per 100 square meters (4187 per acre), Prunus virginiana individuals <br />totaled 65.42 individuals per 100 square meters (2647lacre), Amelanchier alnifolia <br />• provided 51.72 individuals per 100 square meters (2093 per acre), and Rnsa uoodsii <br />individuals accounted for 39.2 individuals per 100 square meters (1586 per acre). <br />Ren,a;ning woody plant species encountered during density sampling accounted for less <br />than 2.5 individuals per 100 square meters each. Thirteen woody plant species were <br />encountered during density sampling in the oakbrush community. <br />Species Diversity <br />Within the oakbrush community cover sampling, four lifeforms were represented; <br />graminoids, forts, woody shrubs and trees. The lifeforms included four species of <br />perennial grasses, fifteen perennial forts, and eight woody shrubs, and two trees. Of <br />the 29 species encountered during cover sampling, 27 were native (two grasses, fifteen <br />forts, and ten woody plants) and two were introduced (two grasses). As would be <br />expected in a largely undisturbed old age shrub dominated community, introduced <br />species accounted for only 2.53 percent of the mean vegetation cover. Seasonality of <br />oakbrush species was predominantly cool season, with one perennial fort being <br />identified as warm season. Woody species were predominantly deciduous, with three <br />species being evergreen. Table 1 provides a listing and characterization of the plant <br />species encountered during cover sampling at the study area. <br />Six species of the 29 encountered during cover sampling accounted for greater than <br />• three percent relative cover. Five of the svc species were woody plants. These species <br />included; Quercus gambelti with 47.37 percent relative cover, Amelanchier alnifolia <br />-lo- <br />