Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />IJ <br /> <br />IJ <br />be buried beneath a roadbed, then the pipeline ROW should be prepared using brush-hogging, <br />not blading. Brush-hogging reduces the surface disturbance needed to a small proportion of the <br />ROW used by ditching machinery: This practice retains most ROW soils intact and allows for <br />native vegetation resprouting from the rootstock, and reduces the opportunities for noxious weed <br />invasion. <br />15. Potential Negative Impacts of Revegetation Must Be Considered <br />Reseeding the project area without using native plant species and locally-collected seeds may <br />have unintended negative effects on rare plants. On the other hand, leaving disturbed soils <br />exposed may aid weed establishment. For this reason, surface disturbances should simply be <br />avoided in rare plant habitats and kept to a minimum throughout the project azea. To reduce the <br />likelihood that non-native species will not establish in the proposed project azea, the BLM must <br />use native plant species for revegetation as well as locally-collected seeds to preserve local <br />genotypes and species composition. <br />Revegetation methods should entail more than simply scattering seed on the ground because this <br />is unlikely to be ineffective. In the Zink et al. (1995) pipeline disturbance study cited above, <br />similar methods were employed, and ten years later the pipeline was completely dominated by <br />exotics: <br />Initial reclamation procedures, based on 1972 regulations and techniques, <br />concentrated on reestablishing above-ground biomass through direct seeding of <br />the pipeline corridor. The highly compacted soil on the corridor was not prepared <br />for direct seeding through imprinting or ripping, nor was any irrigation system <br />established for initial seedling establishment. Native and exotic seeds were <br />dispersed with no monitoring program in place to ensure that successful <br />restoration occurred. Such procedures, emphasizing the rapid establishment of <br />vegetation cover, have historically been the primary methods of restoration. In <br />many cases, such as the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve, these methods have <br />been unsuccessful, (p. 309) <br />The BLM must consider the environmental impacts of revegetation efforts in the project area, <br />' and the BLM must ensure that such efforts do not have negative effects on rare plant species and <br />the overall native ecosystem. <br />16. Climate Change Will Likely Exacerbate All of the Threats and Impacts <br />Aforementioned <br />It is highly likely that climate change, and the associated natural earth systems that it will disrupt, <br />will adversely affect these species. McCarty (2001) cautioned that "[o]ngoing climate change is <br />' an additional source of stress for species akeady threatened by local and global environmental <br />changes, increasing the risk of extinction." In the last 100 years the average temperature in Fort <br />Collins, Colorado has increased 4.1 °F, and precipitation has decreased by approximately 5 <br />Center for Native Ecosystems Paget 5 of 24 <br />Scoping Comments for the Proposed Red Cliff Coat Mine <br /> <br />