My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE134363
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE134363
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:35:04 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 2:11:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2008086
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
12/7/2006
Doc Name
Public Scoping Report for the Environmental Impact Statement
From
BLM
To
DRMS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
177
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~~ <br />The midget faded rattlesnake (SC) is a probable resident ofthe habitat to be effected. The longnose leopard lizard (SC) <br />also occurs in the area, and was noted in the 2006 ecological inventory. The pond located in the vicinity of the <br /> <br />proposed train loadout is believed to provide important habitat for the Great Basin spadefoot toad. The 2006 survey ' <br />map also indicates there are jurisdictional wetlands adjacent to one portion ofthe proposed rail line. Wetlands should <br />be protected and avoided. ' <br />Impacts to wildlife may include direct mortality, habitat destruction, decreases in the ability of wildlife to utilize <br />important habitats (habitat effectiveness) due to increased disturbance, and habitat fragmentation resulting from the <br />inability of certain species to negotiate obstacles such as the proposed conveyor system. Another issue of significant <br />concern is the potential for the railroad line to fragment habitat. Fencing of the railway would have severe negative <br />consequences for pronghorn antelope. As an alternative we recommend slow train speeds aze encouraged in order to <br />reduce the potential for collisions with wildlife or livestock. , <br />We anticipate that impacts to wintering populations of deer and elk from new disturbance could be significant. The <br />route between the Unit Train Loadout and the Mine Entries bisects an important winter range for both deer and elk. In <br /> <br />addition, the proposed Coal Mine Waste Disposal Area (gob pile) is sited on a sagebrush bench that has moderate to , <br />heavy use by wintering elk and moderate use by wintering mule deer. Desert sagebrush habitats are critically important <br />to wildlife and once disturbed cannot be replaced in the neaz term. We recommend minimizing disturbance in the <br /> <br />sagebrush and pinon juniper habitats to preserve their value as big game winter ranges. Location of facilities and soil , <br />borrow pits should be carefully considered to avoid the two locally important habitat types: sagebrush and pinon- <br />juniper. Topsoil is limited in the area and may need to be imported in order to achieve successful reclamation of the <br />gob pile slopes. <br />Water is an important habitat component for wildlife in azid regions. The current proposal for construction ofthe new <br />mine and transportation facilities would alter existing drainage patterns, causing changes in the amount and distribution <br /> <br />of water that wildlife is dependent upon. Additionally, the railway's activity would likely cause displacement and could ' <br />have a wildlife avoidance fringe effect. This could move wildlife away from water sources they cun•ently use. We <br />suggest you to consider these impacts, and consult with CDOW with regard to creation ofadditional watering locations <br />for wildlife mitigation. Additionally, for water quality protection and reducing the effects of increasing soil salinity <br />during runoff events, we suggest the project proponent consider lining the gob pile. <br />The CDOW recognizes that with a project ofthis scope, a certain level of impact on wildlife is inevitable. In instances , <br />where on site mitigation is not feasible, impacts could be offset by implementing improvements on properly recently <br />purchased by the mine along the rail spur. These improvements could include pasture enhancements, water <br />developments, creation of wetlands or other wildlife habitat improvements. These lands may also provide recreation <br />opportunities for the public if managed properly. CDOW would welcome opportunities to work with project <br />proponents to develop on site and offsite mitigation projects that would be mutually beneficial to the operator as well <br />as wildlife. Furthermore, CDOW recommends a yeazly monitoring program to include field surveys and an annual <br />report to assess changes to habitat and species. CDOW would appreciate collaboration with the Colorado Division of <br />Reclamation, Mining and Safety and the Bureau ofLand Management (BLM) on aweed management/reclamarionptan <br />for the Red Cliff Mine. <br />Finally, we recommend utilization of the Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) database which contains <br />information on species occurrence and habitat. The NDIS data can be accessed through the Wildlife Species link on the <br />DOW website (wildlife state.co.usl. In addition, field surveys would be necessary to evaluate the distribution and ' <br />abundance of important wildlife species and their habitats. Information about raptor nest locations is available through <br />NDIS, the U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service, and the BLM. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.