My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE134354
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE134354
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:35:03 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 2:10:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1997054
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/10/1998
Doc Name
RATIONALE FOR RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL OVER OBJECTIONS REGULAR 112 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS PERMIT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J . • • • <br />Page 1 ~ <br />6. `'Will Agile Stones Systems' proposed sediment ponds actually contain such a deluge of, or <br />will tons of sediment be released into an already troubled river?" <br /> <br />Objector Response -The sediment control ponds are designed to handle the 100-year 24-hour <br />storm event. <br />7. "Two old wells close to the proposed site are contaminated by cyanide. Blasting could cause <br />damage to them and pollution to Tallahassee Creek and the Arkansas River." <br />(R. Dodd, N. Dodd) <br />Response - (See Response for 1.) <br />8. "There are lazge deposits of uranium in the Tallahassee Creek drainage. I want to be assured <br />that poison will not move to my water. My well is within 1 mile of the proposed Agile <br />operation." <br />(J. Worthley, S Steers, M Brown) <br />Response -There are no known uranium deposits in the permit area that would be disturbed <br />by the proposed mining operation. There are uranium deposits in the upper reaches of the <br />Tallahassee Creek watershed that were prospected in the past. <br />9. "Proof of adequate water is only shown for the first 4 yeazs, not for the life of the mine, <br />which is rated at 50 yeazs." <br />(M. Brown, J. Brown) <br />Response - (See Response for 3.) <br />10. "lf the high sediment wash water is dumped into the applicant's gravel pit, added turbidity <br />in my spring will be caused by the gravel pit operation." <br />{R. Steers. 1L1. Brox~n, J Brox~n) <br />Objector Response -The applicant does not plan [o wash the gravel. The intent is to <br />suppress dust with water that will flow to a gravel pit which will be well-filtered before it <br />leaves the permit area. The filtering will come from the sand and gravel under the gravel <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.