My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE134290
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE134290
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:34:59 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 2:06:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
VOLUME 4-SURFACE WATER APPENDIX- EAST ROATCAP CREEK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• above have been evaluated and are described below. The <br />alternatives are illustrated in Figures H-2 and H-3. Both <br />alternatives use a 48-inch diameter corrugated steel (CSP) <br />culvert as the conveyance section. <br />Alternative A consists of the CSP laid at the stream grade <br />of about 12.68. An inlet control structure constructed of riprap <br />obtained from the portal bench excavation is recommended. The <br />structure may be augmented by debris posts, a debris basin, or <br />turning up the end of the culvert to settle out debris before <br />flow enter the culvert. An outlet structure should also be <br />constructed of riprap. The structure should serve the purpose of <br />an energy dissipator as well as bottom and side slope lining. <br />On-site riprap may not be large enough to withstand high <br />velocities. If this is the case it would be necessary to grout <br />the available boulders. <br />A potential problem with Alternative A is the steep culvert <br />grade. The constant movement of bed load sediment in the sand <br />and gravel size range, and up to boulder size range transported <br />during high flows, could abrade and damage or destroy the culvert <br />invert. The availability of sediment of this size and the <br />possibility of excavating a sediment trap upstream of the culvert <br />will be evaluated during final design. <br />• Alternative B has the same inlet control features as <br />Alternative A but mitigates the potential abrasion problem by <br />laying the CSP at a flatter grade on the order of 28. Velocities <br />at this slope are not fast enough to cause the constant abrasion <br />from smaller sediment particles or to move the damaging large <br />sediment particles. However, this alternative requires a <br />conveyance section from the downstream face of the embankment to <br />the stream bed. An additional section of 48-inch CSP laid down <br />the slope is currently proposed, however, an open channel section <br />will also be evaluated. A vacuum relief valve would be required <br />at the grade break to prevent possible pipe collapse during high <br />flows. <br />2.8 Diversion Ditches <br />2.8.1 General Description <br />There is an undisturbed watershed of about 14.6 acres above <br />the proposed portal bench cut. It is proposed to intercept and <br />divert overland flows from this area around the disturbed area to <br />East Roatcap Creek. The area of the watershed that drains to the <br />road is 13.2 acres as shown on Figure H-1. 1.4 acres drains from <br />the road to the proposed cut. To avoid the necessity of cutting <br />a new diversion ditch through undisturbed terrain above the <br />portal bench cut, the existing road is tentatively proposed to be <br />used for the ditch alignment. Final ditch alignment will be <br />determined in conjunction with sediment pond and portal bench <br />final design. <br />A <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.