My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE134266
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE134266
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:34:58 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 2:04:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 70 REFUSE PILE EXPANSION
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REFUSE P/LE EXPANSION <br />control maximum runoff resulting from a 100-year, <br />24-hour Type fI precipitation event; the estimated <br />maximum runoff was obtained from the Phase 4 <br />scenario, using and SCS runoff curve number of 88 <br />for the reclaimed sideslopes. Refer to Section 6.2 <br />for peak runoff calculations. <br />Sediment ditch design computations were <br />performed using the Chezy-Manning equation for <br />open channel flow. A Manning roughness constant <br />of n=0.03 was used for the ditch surface, and a <br />minimum freeboard of 0.3 feet was required for the <br />design. All ditches are V-notch shaped, with 2H:1 V <br />side slopes. Recommended maximum flow <br />velocities were obtained from Table 3, page 54 of <br />The Design of Roadside Drainage Channels, <br />Department of Commerce, Bureau of Public Roads, <br />1965. <br />The sediment ditches were divided into segments <br />and designed according to slope grade and the <br />proportion of the peak runoff to be conveyed. <br />Design criteria and calculations are presented in <br />Appendix L. Scouring will be prevented by limiting <br />flow velocity with appropriately sized riprap and <br />lining the ditch floor with geotextile or equivalent <br />~,~ material as necessary. Ditch design parameters are <br />presented in Table 13. Sediment ditches will <br />convey all runoff from the disturbed area to the <br />sedimentation pond located at the base of the RPE. <br />6.5 Clear Water Diversion <br />Clear water diversion ditch/berths will be <br />constructed along the accessible area upgradient <br />from the upper perimeter of the RPE as shown in <br />Appendix B. All water below [he diversion berms <br />will Flow into the RPE sediment pond. The berms <br />are essentially V-notch ditches with cut soil bermed <br />on the downgradient side to ensure clear water is <br />diverted. The berms are designed to control <br />maximum runoff possible from a Type 11 100-yr, <br />24-hr precipitation event; refer to Section 6:L and <br />Appendix L for peak runoff calculations. <br />Clear water runoff from the area above the RPE will <br />be diverted into Sylvester Gulch along the western <br />edge, and toward the unnamed drainage between <br />Sylvester Gulch and Box Canyon, east of the RPE <br />area. Runoff from the land upgradient from the <br />RPE was computed using an SCS Curve Number of <br />60 for undisturbed land. Runoff diversion ditches <br />and/or berms will be built for each construction <br />phase, and are designed according to slope <br />conditions. In addition, an upper clear water <br />diversion ditch berm will be constructed for the life <br />of the pile. Riprap and geotextile or equivalent <br />material were specified as needed to prevent <br />scouring. The diversion ditch/berm for each phase <br />has been divided into segments. Design parameters <br />for each seemen[ are presented in Table 14. <br />Clear water diverted toward the unnamed drainage <br />between Sylvester Gulch and Box Canyon shall pass <br />through an existing 220-ft long, 42-inch diameter <br />corrugated metal pipe (CMP) culvert and outlet into <br />the North Fork of the Gunnison river. Based upon <br />an SCS CN of 60 and a 100-year, 24-hour <br />precipitation event of 2.8-inches, the peak runoff <br />flow in the unnamed drainage is estimated to be <br />37.4 cfs. Using these same parameters, the peak <br />runoff for the flow from above the RPE to be <br />diverted into the unnamed drainage is estimated to <br />be 14.6 cfs. The combined peak flow will be 52 cfs <br />for the 100-year, 24-hour event. The existing <br />culvert and the drainage channel were examined to <br />see if the capacity could accommodated the <br />additional runoff influx. Results of the analysis are <br />presented in Appendix L. Assuming a 1% slope, <br />full flow with outlet control, the existing 220-feet <br />long. 42-inch diameter CMP has the apparent <br />capacity to convey 55-cfs without head above the <br />inlet, which is adequate for the expected peak Flow. <br />Clear water diverted into Sylvester Gulch will pass <br />through the existing Sylvester Gulch culvert beneath <br />Highway 133. No additional Flow through the <br />Svlves[er Gulch culvert will result from this <br />diversion because [he runoff proposed to be <br />diverted curently routes through the culvert at a <br />downgradient location. <br />Clear water ditch design computations were 6.6 Sedimentation Pond Design <br />performed using the same procedures and <br />!;~ parameters described in Section 6.4. A sediment settling pond was designed to collect the <br />sediment runoff from each phase of the RPE and <br />Harding Lawson Associates 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.