Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />5) Concerns about the groundwater and surface water flows from the north, should the drainage tiles <br />be disturbed; also a concern that the drainage agreement will not be honored. This concern is <br />included above under DMG technical adequacy items numbers 3 and 9, and in Tom Schreiner's <br />review, numbers 3 and 7. <br />6) Concerns about the groundwater and surface water flows if the ponds aze lined, and the <br />subsurface drainage area is reduced to a corridor through the residential azea. This concern is <br />included above under DMG technical adequacy item number 3, and in Tom Schreiner's review, <br />number 8. <br />7) Concerns regazding the possible narrowing of the 100-yeaz flood plain, and subsequent flooding. <br />This concern is included above under DMG technical adequacy item number 3 and in Tom <br />Schreiner's review, number 1, 2b, and 8. <br />8) Concerns that the stockpiling of materials neaz the river may change the course of the river. This <br />concern is included above under DMG technical adequacy item number 3 and in Tom <br />Schreiner's review, number 2a. <br />9) Concerns that the re-seeding will not be done in a timely fashion, and that weeds will encroach <br />upon the site and surrounding azeas. Please verify that only two acres at a time will be in the <br />process of preparing for re-seeding each yeaz, and that the rest of the 34 disturbed acres will <br />either be actively worked or part of the processing facilities. <br />10) Concerns that the groundwater monitoring plan is inadequate. This concern is included above <br />under DMG technical adequacy item number 3, and in Tom Schreiner's review, number 8. <br />11) Concerns that the public on-site posting only consisted of one 8'/z" x 11" page at the proposed <br />site entrance. This posting is actually standazd for new sites, and is not considered a problem by <br />DMG, in accordance with Rule 1.6.2(I)(b) of the Construction•Materials Rules and Regulations. <br />The following concerns do not fall directly under DMG's jurisdiction, but were also expressed by the <br />adjacent landowners: <br />12) Concerns about the isolation of the housing development. <br />13) Concerns regazding noise. <br />14) Concerns regazding increased traffic. <br />15) Concerns regazding dirt. <br />16) Concerns regazding unpleasant views for many homeowners. <br />17) Concerns regazding damage to local roads due to heavy truck traffic. <br />18) Concerns regazding property devaluation due to adjacent mining. <br />