My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE134077
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE134077
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:34:46 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 1:52:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
RENEWAL 2.04.7 HYDROLOGY DESCRIPTION
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• by the configuration of the top of clay and zones or channels of increased <br />permeability. Hydraulic conductivities are estimated to be 3 gallons/day/ftZ in <br />these zones. Ground-water conditions would be considered unconfined. <br />However, locally confined conditions may exist in the less weathered portions of <br />overburden clays and silts. Instantaneous discharge rates estimated for the entire <br />length of an excavated face are between 1 to 10 gpm, with maximum total <br />accumulated discharge rates of less than 5 gpm (excavated face =pit length = <br />2700 ft.). <br />The lower portion of the coal seam (bottom 2 ft.) occasionally discharges small <br />amounts of ground water into the coal void just after mining. Ground water <br />production rates from an excavated coal face 60 ft. by 8 ft. have not exceeded 1 <br />gpm. Occurrence of water in the coal seam appears to be somewhat restricted to <br />structural depressions of the coal seam. Ground-water production rates do not <br />increase significantly as mining approaches the western boundary of Ennis Draw. <br />This suggests that the coal seam has very low permeability (hydraulic conductivity <br />estimated to be .23 or 23 gpd/ft2 - 29 gpd/ftZ, McWhorter) and/or the coal seam <br />does not have lateral continuity to the fluvial deposits of Ennis Draw. Since the <br />coal is considered to be a confined aquifer, and is not fully saturated, it would be <br />reasonable to conclude that the coal seam does not have hydraulic conductivity <br />with the Ennis Draw subsurface water system and associated stream deposits. <br />• Please refer to the following cross-sectional views depicting geohydrological <br />conditions existing in the second five year permit area. These cross-sections show <br />the relationships between the second 5 year extension area and other ground-water <br />systems in the area. No surface water features exist in the area (for additional <br />information, refer to 2.06.8). <br /> <br />52 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.