My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE134062
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE134062
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:34:45 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 1:52:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1997054
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/9/1997
Doc Name
FN M-97-054 ADEQUACY ITEMS
From
LARRY D OEHLER
To
MITCH ALBERT
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT C PRE MINING & MINING PLAN MAPS OF THE AFFECTED LANDS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DEFICIENCY NOTICE CM1ILRB 112 Permit Application <br />Agile Stone Systems. Inc. <br />more discussion of this statement. Is the material to be removed as product or as <br />salvage material for reclamation? If it is to be used for reclamation, provide more <br />details regarding storage and placement in reclamation backfill. <br />No overburden is involved in this project. Therefore, there is oo discussion. <br />8. Your section 1.3 soil salvage states that at least 10 feet will be stripped ahead of <br />any area to be mined. It is assumed that this is in reference to the gravel mining <br />operation. What is the maximum buffer azea to be stripped ahead of mining <br />granite and limestone? <br />There is no limestone in the permit area. The maximum buffer area to be <br />stripped ahead of mining granite will depend upon the reclamation <br />calculations in Exhibit L. Exhibit L currently assumes the complete <br />stripping of each phase prior to mining. Phase I would have all phase I areas <br />stripped prior to mining. The second scenario in exhibit L assumed all of <br />Phase I and all of Phase II stripped. The 3rd scenario assumed that at least <br />most of Phase I areas would be reclaimed prior to stripping Phase III areas. <br />If the Division recognizes the reduced or timed acreage in the bond <br />reclamation, then a different approach can betaken in stripping. <br />i 9. Section 1.3 of your reclamation plan states that soil screened from the gravel bar <br />aggregate will be saved for future use as topsoil in reclamation. It is assumed that <br />you are referring to fines which will be primarily sand and small size gravel. This <br />fraction of the pit run material will most likely be very low in nutrient value and <br />water holding capacity. Unless properly amended this material will probably not <br />be a good plant growth medium and may erode due to lack of vegetative cover. <br />Please explain how you intend to overcome these problems. <br />Topsoil taken from the gravel bar will have large cobbles and boulders <br />removed before placing it in the topsoil stockpile. There will no mixing of <br />fines from plant operations and topsoil unless the experimental program to <br />test such admixtures proves successful. If successful, the current plan is to <br />only use such admixtures in the quarry area to increase wildlife habitat <br />during final reclamation. <br />0. Your section 1.? states that "For future reclamation by the operator, landowner or <br />another party an appropriate amount of topsoil will be left in a noticeable, shaped, <br />and seeded stockpile within 50 feet of the mineral stockpiles remaining after final <br />reclamation." Please explain this statement. There should be no mineral <br />stockpiles or topsoil stockpiles left after final reclamation. <br />\J <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.