Laserfiche WebLink
FeGrnnp~ 1999 Taart Mine * 13-12 Drainage and Sediment Lontro/ Plan ~ 9 <br />used in the analysis. <br />• A Stock Pond Stability Analysis, conducted for the Seneca II Mine Tab 13, Appendix 13-9A, Yolume <br />12) by MWH, used aworst-case scenario, which proved to be stable. In summary, the analysis <br />contains the following: <br />A force limit equilibrium stability analysis was completed using the Slope/W software <br />package. A Morgenstern Price analysis was used in conjunction with a search routine to <br />estimate the lowest safety factor for the embankment. This method satisfies both moment <br />and force equilibrium of a given analysis. <br />For the worst-case scenario, embankment geometry with the following characteristics was <br />used: <br />• Embankment Crest Width: 5 Feet <br />• Downstream Slope Height: 9 Feet <br />• Downstream Slope Angle: 2H:1V <br />• Upstream Slope Height: 8 Feet <br />• Upstream Slope Angle: 2H:IV <br />• Height from Spillway Invert to Upstream Slope Toe: 5 Feet <br />The embankments are constmcted from spoil material produced during mining, This <br />material was placed in controlled lifts and compacted. Based on this fact, observations of <br />the onsite spoil piles, and typical strength values for spoil material, the following strength <br />properties were assigned to the embankment. <br />• Spoil: ~ = 38s; cohesion = 0 psi <br />• Urtit Weight = 120 pcf <br />Based on these assumptions, a safety factor of 1.56 was calculated by the limit equilibrittm analysis. <br />Rule 4.03.9(8)(b) states that stock ponds shall have a minimum static safety factor of 1.3. Based on <br />this analysis and that the Yoast Mine will use the same construction methodology, it is concluded <br />that the proposed stock pond designs will meet or exceed the minimum safety criteria established <br />in Rule 4.05.9. <br />~.0 REFERENCES <br />Barfield, Wamer, & Haan (1981). Applied Hydsalogy and Sedimentology for Disturbed Areas. Oklahoma <br />Technical Press, Stillwater, Oklahoma. <br />Nyenhuis, J. (Dec. 1997). Seneca II W South Expansion Soil Survey. <br />Renard, K.G., G.R. Foster, G.A. Weesies, D.K. McCool, and D.C. Yoder, coordinators. (1996). Predicting <br />Soil Erosion by Water: A Guide to Conservation Planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss <br />Equation (RUBLE). Agricultural Handbook No, 703. U.S. Department of Agriculture. ~naldrafi7 <br />Schwab and Wamer (1998); SEDCAD4 Design Manual and user's Guide, University of Kentucky, <br />Biosystems and Agrculrural Engineering Department. <br />Soil Conservation Service (1983). Soils of Colorado, Lors Factors and Erndibility Hydrologic Groupings. <br />• Soil Conservation Service (1986). Urban Hydrology jor Small Watersheds (TK-55). <br />PR-02 Rrvired3/OS <br />Montgomery lY/ahan Mining Gro>p * 765 S. Union Ban/amrd, ,fnile 460 * llrkeuood, Colorado 80228 * (303) 763-5740 <br />