My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE133672
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE133672
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:34:19 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 1:27:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977344
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/21/1978
Doc Name
EXCLUSION OF PORTLAND CEMENT MANUFACTURING FACILITIES FROM AFFECTED LAND
From
IDEAL BASIC INDUSTRIES
To
MLR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />about 2,500 feet by belt conveyor over the Arkansas river, a railroad <br />and highway from secondary crushing in the quarry to the off-site <br />cement plant. The Boettcher, Colorado cement plant was constructed <br />as close as convenient to the major source of limestone and shale, <br />but this unusual quarry now extends up to 5 miles northward. Chemical <br />grade limestone from remote locations has always been required. <br />Sandstone and gypsum are extracted from remote quarries and trans- <br />ported to the Boettcher plant. <br />4. Ideal's cement plants located in 11 other states, some of <br />which have affected land definitions almost identical to Colorado <br />regulations, have been uniformly excluded from "affected lands." <br />5. On March 2, 1978 Mr. Roy Stienmier and the writer attended <br />a Colorado Mined Land Reclamation board meeting in which inclusion <br />of concentrating facilities was discussed. Later that day we dis- <br />cussed Ideal's exclusion of cement plant facilities with staff <br />specialist, P1r, Jim Schmieding. Plr. C. C. McCall was in an adja- <br />cent office, so the question was further discussed with him where <br />some of the exclusion factors were mentioned, including the use of <br />other raw materials, We were then assured that the cement plant <br />should not be included in affected land. <br />6. The brochure "The Making of Portland Cement" describes <br />the heavy industrial type facilities that are very expensive <br />installations. As a result, high taxes, salvage of equipment <br />and other considerations have provided a sufficient incentive <br />to demolish and reclaim obsolete or unused structures and equip- <br />ment. During the last 8 years Ideal has demolished facilities <br />at four plants that were shut down. At four other locations, all <br />facilities Caere removed except structures and equipment that have <br />been leased or have utility for other purposes. <br />7. Ideal currently operates fifteen modern cement production <br />plants with projected life periods from of 50 to several hundred <br />years. Plants were constructed in recent years at three entirely <br />new locations. Fully independent production facilities were later <br />constructed at six existing cement plant locations, Unuseable <br />structures were then demolished and the areas reclaimed. The <br />Portland, Colorado plantsite has had three independent cement <br />production units, two of which are currently in operation. Ex- <br />tensive additions or improvements have been provided at four loca- <br />tions including the Boettcher, Colorado plant, where another major <br />improvement, with increased production, is currently scheduled. <br />At Mobile, Alabama a new production facility is scheduled at an <br />estimated cost of 175 million dollars. <br />This review of plant sites is given in order to emphasize <br />the extremely long life expectancy as compared to structures and <br />life span of the average mining operation around which current <br />-4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.