My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE133432
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE133432
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:34:07 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 1:10:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2003091
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/16/2004
Doc Name
Stability of Irrigation Ditches and other Structures.
From
DMG
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo to Erica Crosby 3 January 16, 2004 <br />Duckworth Pit Setbacks and Ditch Seeoaee Permit No. M-2003-091 <br />The permit application does not provide the easement width for Idaho Creek through the proposed <br />permit area. <br />For the most part, the setbacks described and illustrated above are adequate to assure the structural <br />stability of the ditches and the other manmade facilities around the pit. However, the ten-foot setback <br />from the Smith and Emmons Ditch easement line results in a setback distance that is less than two times <br />the maximum 25-foot pit depth. This setback is not in accord with Applicant's engineering analysis <br />provided in Exhibit S, and the DMG would not accept this setback distance without further analysis. <br />The Operator must specify which of the various proposed setbacks will be the enforceable permit <br />conditions for the operation of the Duckworth Pit. In selecting the setback distance requirements, the <br />Operator should consider their rights to mine within any easements. If the Operator selects setback <br />distances that indicate mining will take place within easements, proof of legal right of entry will be <br />required. The Operator must further specify the angle at which the pit slope will be excavated as <br />mining approaches a structure or a setback line, must specify landmarks from which setback distances <br />will be measured, e.g., from the top of the ditch bank or from the ditch centerline, from a property or <br />easement line or from the edge of the structure itself? And the Operator must specify how and when the <br />setback lines will be located and marked. <br />The permit application commits to a 10-foot mining setback from the west property line. The DMG has <br />previously approved the installation of a slurry wall 23-feet further to the west of that same property <br />line. The slurry wall approval was made under the auspices of reclamation permit M-1994-027 held by <br />Aggregate Industries. This means that mining of the Duckworth Pit could occur as close as 33-feet to <br />the location of the proposed slurry wall, as illustrated in the following cross section. <br />Mined <br />Face <br />Approx. ' "'y"`y <br />25-feet Line Slurry Wall <br />The proposed ten-foot setback from the west property line results in a setback from the slurry wall that <br />is less than two times the maximum 25-foot pit depth. This setback is not in accord with Applicant's <br />engineering analysis provided in Exhibit S, and the DMG would not accept this setback distance <br />without further analysis. The DMG would accept a 30-foot setback for the west property line as being <br />protective of the proposed slurry wall. <br />The Ditch Company has provided DMG with written comments expressing concern with the potential <br />for increased seepage losses from the Smith and Emmons Ditch during the dewatering and excavation <br />ofthe Duckworth Pit. The DMG concurs with the Ditch Company's position that this is a legitimate <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.