My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE133216
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE133216
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:33:56 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 12:59:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
AQUATIC COMMUNITIES
Section_Exhibit Name
APPENDIX J
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
L, <br />(i.e. rocks, wood debris). All water floe was diverted through the sampling dip- <br />net or graded sieve. Several net samples were composited into a graded sieve. <br />IE the bottom was muddy or margins of the stream were thick with vegetation or <br />algae, then grab samples of each or both were added to the sieve. Once all the <br />samples were obtained, [hen everything [hat could be removed (i.e. large rocks, <br />twigs, etc.) or broken up (mud or sand, etc.) were flushed with an adequate sup- <br />ply of [he flowing water to clean the sample so macroinvertebrate specimens could <br />be picked. Where ample water was not present to clean the sample completely in <br />the field, [hen the mud, vegetative detritus and algal mate were placed in the <br />collection jars to be cleaned in the lab. <br />The more lentic sites (still water) were sampled similarly but grab samples from <br />the bottom, vegetation, and any organism observed were added to the composite <br />sieve. Long-handled dip nets were used to collect benthon, neuston, nekton and <br />plankton samples outside normal reach. <br />. . These dip nets were used to capture the large free swimming varieties observed. <br />Cleaning procedures, as above, were employed if the water source was sufficient. <br />Samples were cleaned in the field as thoroughly as possible. Those with heavy <br />algal mats, detritus, mudballs or heavy sediment were cleaned more thoroughly in <br />the laboratory (March, 1980). The taxa collected are discussed for each sampling <br />site in the results section. Field sorting was accomplished by washing and pick- <br />ing specimens from number 20 and 40 graded brass sieves. Lab cleaning and sort- <br />ing was done in number 50 sieves. Only eight (8) sites, of the nine sampled, <br />provided specimens for taxonomic analyses. Specimens were preserved in the field <br />with 70 percent isopropyl alcohol in glass jars. After sorting and picking, spe- <br />cimens were stored in glass specimen tubes. Only four (4) samples required <br />extensive laboratory picking and sorting. <br />Taxonomy work was done by biologists at Trapper Mine with verification of diffi- <br />cult specimens by Keefe (1980) and Mariah (1980). <br />r~ <br />U <br />J -5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.