My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE133133
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE133133
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:33:52 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 12:53:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977141
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/21/1981
Doc Name
PUBLIC NOTICE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
R intlahl & Assouates <br />i~.a. T~'^.e area an question will be r-ecie.iined ir. accordance with <br />the _.,_stine lease and appr-owed re~iamaticn plan unless a <br />change .~ mutually agreed upon by the landowner and the <br />cperator. <br />b. See paraeraph 13. a. <br />14.a. Costs for eclamatien include tests for al :. areas. <br />Seeding, mulchinc, and fertilising cannot be accomplished <br />in "me.;^r" or "mode-ate" di =_turbed aree.s. F.oads <br />constructed as a result of the mining operation wi'1 6e <br />reclaimed the same as other disturhF:d areas. <br />b. The raclamatior. cents are en a "by area" basis and apply to <br />each e.rea. <br />if Bach area veers to he Wined as a =_eparate entity and <br />trended separately, the cost to reclaim rrould be <br />appro::imately. <br />Area l 31;,900 <br />Area ~ s '00 <br />Area _. ??, lOCi <br />P.rea 8, ~Oi~ <br />The=_e ce=_ts are worst case costs. The tet~.i of these area <br />costs 4:OLlid not apply since the areas o-~i1i net be disturbed <br />at the same time. <br />c. The 54 acre figure is correct. The indi~:~idL:al askiner the <br />question apparently did net understand that areas will be <br />in different states of reciamaticn and are not acditive as <br />far as total area is ccrcerned. <br />d. The -e::pl~oratior. _s net included as a part of i_he recl3ma- <br />tior: permit. The operatcr has asreed to remove the re63rs. <br />1~. The condition. of the lease is a me.tter met:•:eon the lar.dca~ner <br />and the operator. The intention, e: this hearing procedure, <br />ir. the opinion of the cperator, is to force the operatcr into <br />e, position. where he would agree to a ne:•: lease. The cperator <br />a:ill attempt to negotiate a new lease, but until that is <br />aCC GfI1pI15heL•, ~:he operatcr cer.siders the existing lease valid <br />end in fence. <br />lE•. ~Soted. <br />17. The cperator feels that a hearing is not necessary in that <br />all items contained in the staff adequacy let*_er have been <br />pr-cperly address=_ed. The matter ^f a new ?ease should be <br />.esclved beto:een the landowner and the operat~~r ar.d is not a <br />:-:a_tar which sheLUd be presented to the t1i.^.ed Land <br />Feclamation Roard for resolution by that 5ody. <br /> <br />& Environmental <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.