Laserfiche WebLink
<br />5) Concerns about the groundwater and surface water flows from the north, should the drainage tiles <br />be disturbed; also a concern that [he drainage agreement will not be honored. This concern is <br />included above under DMG technical adequacy items numbers 3 and 9, and in Tom Schreiner's <br />review, numbers 3 and 7. <br />6) Concerns about the groundwater and surface water flows if the ponds are lined, and the <br />subsurface drainage area is reduced to a corridor through the residential area. This concern is <br />included above under DMG technical adequacy item number 3, and in Tom Schreiner's review, <br />number 8. <br />7) Concerns regarding the possible narrowing of the 100-year flood plain, and subsequent flooding. <br />This concern is included above under DMG technical adequacy item number 3 and in Tom <br />Schreiner's review, number 1, 2b, and 8. <br />8) Concerns that the stockpiling of materials near the river may change the course of the river. This <br />concern is included above under DMG technical adequacy item number 3 and in Tom <br />Schreiner's review, number 2a. <br />9) Concerns [hat the re-seeding will not be done in a timely fashion, and that weeds will encroach <br />upon the site and surrounding areas. Please verify that only two acres at a time will be in the <br />process of preparing for re-seeding each year, and that the rest of the 34 disturbed acres will <br />either be actively worked or part of the processing facilities. <br />10) Concerns [hat the groundwater monitoring plan is inadequate. This concern is included above <br />under DMG technical adequacy item number 3, and in Tom Schreiner's review, number 8. <br />1 l) Concerns that the public on-site posting only consisted of one 8'/z" x 1 1"page at [he proposed <br />site entrance. This posting is actually standard for new sites, and is not considered a problem by <br />DMG, in accordance with Rule 1.6.2(1)(b) of the Construction Materials Rules and Regulations. <br />The following concerns do not fall directly under DMG's jurisdiction, but were also expressed by the <br />adjacent landowners: <br />12) Concerns about the isolation of the housing developtnent. <br />13) Concerns regarding noise. <br />14) Concerns regarding increased traffic. <br />15) Concerns regarding dirt. <br />16) Concerns regarding unpleasant views for many homeowners. <br />17) Concerns regarding damage to local roads due to heavy truck traffic. <br />I8) Concerns regarding property devaluation due [o adjacent mining. <br />