My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE133050
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE133050
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:33:46 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 12:47:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977378
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/21/1988
Doc Name
MEMO SLUDGE EVALUATION SUNNYSIDE GOLD CORP FN M-77-378
From
MLRD
To
ED BISCHOFF
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />C~ <br />The interpretation of the particle-size distribution by Sunnyside is that if <br />the Terry Tunnel sediment had been derived by precipitation from mines drainage <br />water, the resulting texture would be clay with no silt or sand-sized material <br />present. If a flocculent were added to the mine drainage water to cause <br />precipitation, the resulting sediment would be predominantly silt sized from <br />agglomeration, and not clay sized as proposed. The particle size distribution <br />for the Terry Tunnel sample, as shown in Table 2, may indeed be similar to a <br />sludge from a water treatment system based on precipitation. I find it <br />difficult to conclude that the textural analysis alone confirms these materials <br />are lake sediments washed through the mine from Lake Emma, and that they are <br />not sludges derived from the chemical treatment of mine drainage water as <br />stated in the Sunnyside report. <br />Conclusion <br />Based on the chemical analyses provided for the Terry Tunnel sediment samples <br />collected, and baseline data from the permit, the material is similar to a <br />sludge or slime produced at the Sunnyside Mine. The texture indicates. it is <br />fine grained with a deficit of sand-sized particles. The concentrations of <br />heavy metals, especially Cd, Cu, Pb, Zn and Mn, are similar to sludges rather <br />than native soils or waste rock. Metal concentrations are high and may pose <br />problems for water contacting this material. The sediment is acid forming, <br />potentially toxic, and unsuitable as a plant growth media. Based on these <br />characteristics, it should be disposed of in a lined basin, and covered with <br />material which will allow re vegetation of the disposal area. <br />References Cited <br />Smith, R. M., W. E. Grube, Jr., T. Arkle, Jr., and A. Sobek. 1974. Mine spoil <br />potentials for soil and water quality. U.S. EPA Report EPA-670/2-74-070. <br />Sobeck, A. A., W. A. Schuler, J. R. Freeman, and R. M. Smith. 1978. Field <br />laboratory methods applicable to overburden and minesoils. U. S. EPA Report <br />EPA-600/2-18-054. <br />J1D/eke <br />8263E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.