My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE132827
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE132827
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:33:34 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 12:30:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981033
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 14 Attachments 1 through 5
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />r~ <br />L <br />expected to have existed throughout the past 10,000 years. There <br />is no evidence of significant landform alteration during this time. <br />Therefore, site density is expected to be low in the areas immediately <br />south of Somerset, including those areas investigated during the <br />course of this survey, <br />This a rp iori assumption is partially supported by the results <br />u <br />of the reconnaissance, Materials evidencing prehistoric occupation <br />were not found. This may be in part the result of [he topograpkic <br />characteristics of the specific areas investigated. Most of these <br />localities are located on active flood plains along the perimeters <br />of Sylvester Gulch or the North Fork Gunnison River, or on broad <br />benches overlooking these drainages. In both areas, alluvation is <br />also accompanied by a certain amount of deflation which should <br />disclose the presence of these materials if present. Therefore, <br />their noted absence is considered to be primarily accountable to <br />the former hypothesis, that geographic constraints upon human <br />mobility served to discourage significant instances ~f prehistoric <br />occupation. <br />RECONNAISSANCE 1~THODOLOGY <br />All areas of potential'impact were examined by linear traverses <br />• <br />from a point of origin arbitrarily chosen on the basis of vehicular <br />access, to the terminus. All areas in the immediate vicinity of <br />impact localities were similarly investigated if local_siope did <br />not exceed 207.. Slope values in excess of 207. are considered too <br />extreme to encourage occupation ar retain evidence of it as the <br />result of down-slope movement of surface materials. <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.