Laserfiche WebLink
R~c~~o <br />~,,.~K i ~~ ~sa~ <br />MINED LAND RECLA.MAiION DIVISIOPI <br />Colo. Dept. of Natural Resources <br />Mr. Mark Loye <br />Senior Reclamation Specialist <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Co 80203 <br />Dear Mr. Loye, <br />• <br />II IIIIIIIIIIIII III <br />March 13, 1984 999 <br />8730 West Mountain View La. <br />Littleton, Co 801 5 <br />Re: DiRezza ~k M-$4-028 <br />This letter is in response to yours of February 29, 184. <br />The copy of the signed 4th page of the Application wa~ sent <br />with our written request for continuation. <br />Exhibit B <br />1. Mr. DiRezza has agreed to reclaim all pre-existin dis- <br />turbance within the boundaries of the designated acre as <br />shown in Exhibit C-3. Of course he also agrees to re laim <br />any additional disturbance his mining operation will ncur <br />in the designated area. All reclamation will be done in <br />accordance with Exhibit E, Reclamation Plan. <br />2. Believe me, there is more than enough waste mater: <br />backfilling requirements on the perimeter, slopes. It <br />because of excessive spoil piles dating back 80 years <br />we wanted to avoid the obligation to reclaim the pre-E <br />condition in the first place. But that is resolved it <br />above. <br />3. No comment. <br />Exhibit D <br />1. No brush piles will be established because the <br />be reclaimed for pasture. <br />Exhibit E <br />1. Our intention has always been to determine the va' <br />Phase 3 by our findings along the boundaries of Fhase <br />1B and Phase 2. The question is mute at this po~i.t. <br />Exhibit F & Exhibit G <br />1. No comment. <br />We believe this letter fully resolves all problems wi <br />application that you have raised. <br />S iytFere <br />Approved: Dona~~p <br />lal for <br />was <br />that <br />existing <br />i Item 1 <br />will <br />_ue of <br />lA & <br />the <br />Dave DiRezza <br />cc Dave DiRezza <br />