My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE132758
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE132758
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:33:30 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 12:27:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
X199920506
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Name
CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY MANAGEMENT DATA FORM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Colorado Cultural Resource Survey <br />Prehistoric Archaeological Component Form <br />(page 1 of 3) <br />Use this form in conjunction with the Management Data Form. One of these forms should be completed <br />for each site with a prehistoric component. <br />1. State Site Number: SRT160 2. Temporary Site Number: MM-5111 <br />3. Site Type: open lithic scatter <br />4. General Site Description: This site is a sparse lithic scatter located on the south-facing slope of an <br />east/west-trending ridge. It overlooks asleep-sided tributary of Fish Creek to the east. A small seasonal <br />drainage bounds the site on the south which flows southeasterly down a steep slope to its confluence with <br />the tributary of Fish Creek. A barbed wire fence crosses northwest to southeast along the edge of the ridge <br />immediately west of the site. A old unmarked core hole is located on the ridge top approximately 80 feet <br />northwest of the site and an old road grade to the core hole is still visible on the ridge slope north of the site. <br />The soil is a thin light brown sand on sandstone bedrock. There are several areas on the east and <br />southeast face where there are bedrock outcrops. The soil over most of the ridge has deflated down to a <br />pavement of sandstone gravels and cobbles with only a thin mantle of eroded aeolian deposits along the <br />fenceline to the west of the site. On the gentle slope in the southwestern portion of the site is a small bench <br />where some aeolian sand shadow deposits have accumulated. These deposits are fairly shallow and have <br />been severely eroded and disturbed by rodent activity. The vegetation consists of low sages, grasses, and <br />forbs. <br />When the site was originally recorded in 1979, several tools and fire-cracked stones were noted, although <br />the lithic assemblage was very sparse. Other artifacts noted on the site included a biface tip, a scraper <br />fragment, four utilized flakes, and two cores. A Late Prehistoric projectile point was collected from the site. <br />During the current investigation, the site was found to be heavily deteriorated and to consist of a very sparse <br />scatter of lithic debitage and FCR. The debitage consists of seven flakes and one red chert core fragment. <br />Four of the flakes are tertiary and three are secondary. The lithic debitage was made from white chert and <br />white chalcedony. A few pieces of burned and oxidized sandstone were found but no stains were observed. <br />None of the tools observed during the original recordation were noted. Most of the flakes were located on <br />the edge of the ridge at the north end of the site with a few observed in the drainage bottom at the south end <br />of the site. <br />The site was originally recommended to be eligible for inclusion on the National Register but a <br />justification for that assessment was not given. Presently, the site retains no integrity and appears to be a <br />surface phenomenon. The deposits on the site are thin and highly disturbed. None of the previously <br />observed tools could be relocated and there are no intact features to provide chronological control. Given <br />the lack of integrity, the sparse artifact content, and the lack of potential to contain additional cultural <br />remains, the site is evaluated here to be not eligible for inclusion on the National Register. It has no further <br />information potential and no further work is recommended. An alternate route for the seismic line 9902 was <br />surveyed to avoid the site. However, since it is recommended to be not eligible, the original route, which <br />passes through the center of the.site, can be utilized. <br />5. Prehistoric Non-Architectural Features (note dimensions in meters): <br />Map Ref. Description Construction Material Dimensions <br />None <br />6. Prehistoric Architectural Features (note dimensions in meters): <br />Maa Ref. Description Construction Material Dimensions <br />None <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.