Laserfiche WebLink
at the borrow area also provides additional capacity for gob. It is anticipated that excavation of <br />native soils at Pile No. 4 will continue concurrently with gob placement. <br />Excavation slopes in native material were first evaluated to determine stable slope angles. <br />Excavations with overall slopes not exceeding 2H:1 V resulted in a factor of safety of 1.5 or <br />greater. Given the uncertainty of native soil strength parameters, we recommend a minimum <br />factor of safety of 1.50 for the overall temporary excavation slope. Steeper excavations maybe <br />made for short slopes, but the excavations should be benched into the slope to provide an overall <br />slope of 2H:1 V or flatter for the approximate 118 vertical foot high excavation footprint. <br />Stability was subsequently evaluated for the ultimate gob pile (ultimate height approximately <br />118 feet), considering 2.SH:1 V and 2H:1 V overall excavation slopes. For the model, geometry <br />of the gob was assumed to consist of a 2.SH:1 V slope for the lower 50 vertical feet, with variable <br />slopes above this level. For an excavation slope of 2H:1 V, a gob slope of 3H:1 V was found to <br />result in critical factors of safety greater than 1.50 for effective stress and total stress analyses. <br />Both circulaz and block failures were considered. For an excavation slope of 2.SH:1 V, a gob <br />slope of 2.SH:1 V was found to result in critical factors of safety greater than 1.50 for effective <br />and total stress analyses. <br />These analyses assume that foundation underdrains will be designed and constructed to drain the <br />upper foundation soils, surface water diversion channels will be designed and constructed to <br />convey water azound and away from the gob pile, and that surface water channels will be <br />designed and constructed on the gob pile itself to shed surface water off and away from the gob. <br />It is critical that gob materials aze not placed wet of the optimum moisture content. Gob should <br />be sealed (by compaction) to minimize infiltration from precipitation and should be graded to <br />shed water per the drainage plan. <br />The findings and recommendations provided in this report aze contingent on careful and proper <br />fill placement; inspection, in-situ density testing, and on-going laboratory testing of gob material, <br />as appropriate. <br />7.0 <br />Buckhom Geotech (2006). Geotechnical Report: Stability Evaluation of Coal Waste Disposal <br />Area, Bowie No. 2 Mine, Delta County, Colorado. February I5, 2006. <br />Dunrud, C. Richard (1989). Geologic Map and Coal Stratigraphic Framework of the Paonia <br />Area, Delta and Gunnison Counties, Colorado, United States Geological Survey, Map C- <br />115, 1989. <br />Harr, M.E. (1987). Reliability-Based Design in Civil Engineering, McGraw-Hill, New York. <br />Kulhawy, F.H. (1992). On the Evaluation of Soil Properties, Geotechnical Special Publication <br />31, ASCE, Reston, VA, pp. 95-115. <br />I• <br />Bowie Gob Pile No. 4 stability report <br />Project #OS-126-GEO <br />Page 14 of I S <br />