Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Rule 6.4.6 -the Reclamation Plan Map must contain the expected physical appearance of the area <br />of the affected land, correlated to the proposed mining and reclamation timetables. The map must <br />show proposed topography of the area with contour lines of sufficient detail to portray the <br />direction and rate of slope of all reclaimed lands. You show the expected topography of the <br />reclaimed waste dump area but do not show the final physical appearance of the limestone and <br />dolomite areas. Is this because you have not decided where the mining areas will be located? It <br />appears, you will need to send a revised Reclamation Plan Map when you finally decide where <br />the mined areas aze going to be located (when you submit the technical revision or, possibly, an <br />amendment application showing the mining areas). <br />Rule 6.4.14 -source of legal right to enter the U.S. Forest Service managed ]ands within the <br />permit area must be submitted before the application can be approved. Or, as we discussed, if <br />CLC is able to trade private lands for the public lands within the permit area, copies of the deeds <br />should be submitted. <br />Currently, in Exhibit M, you have stated that "There will be no activity on Forest Service land." <br />L` a permit (contract, agreement, etc.) is issued to CLC by the USFS allowing access to the public <br />lands within the permit area, you will need to revise Exhibit M. <br />Rule 6.4.19 - Exhibit S -Since Ms. Brown's residence is located within 200 feet of the affected <br />land area, the applicant may either: <br />(a) provide a notarized agreement between the applicant and the person(s) having an interest <br />in the structure, that the applicant is to provide compensation for any damage to the <br />structure; or <br />(b) where such an agreement can not be reached, the applicant shall provide an appropriate <br />engineering evaluation that demonstrates that such structure shall not be damaged by <br />activities occurring at the mining operation. The blasting report, and a commitment to <br />conduct pre-blast surveys, resolve flyrock problems and limit the amount of explosives per <br />shot, is adequate demonstration that blasting activities should not adversely affect Ms. <br />Brown's property. Also, Ms. Brown's property will not be adversely affected since mining <br />activities will not occur within 200 feet of the property. <br />If you can not adequately respond to this adequacy letter by July 18, 2001 you must request <br />another extension of the decision due date or the DMG will be required to deny the application. <br />Resolution of water rights issues should be completed before disturbing lands above the waste <br />. ~ : ~ dump. Submit copies of correspondence from the State Engineer's Office when the issues are <br />resolved. <br />f . ,' <br />i, <br />if you have any questions, please give me a call. <br />