My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE131582
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE131582
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:32:24 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 11:19:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 60A SUBSIDENCE EVALUATION REVISED MINE PANEL LAYOUTS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />WEST ELK MINE: SUBSIDENCE EVALUATION <br />OF THE REVISED MINE PANEL LAYOUTS <br />IN SECTION 21 AND SECTIONS 26 AND 27 <br />INTRODUCTION <br />This report describes the results of Wright Water Engineers' (WWE's) evaluation of the <br />subsidence effects of panel layout revisions in Section 21 and Sections 26 and 27, <br />Township 135, Range 90W, 6'" P.M. The subsidence effects were determined using the <br />Comprehensive and Integrated Subsidence Prediction Model (CISPM) developed by Dr. <br />Syd Peng. Additionally, Mr. Rich Dunntd reviewed the model inputs and compazed the <br />model results to those he developed in Exhibit 60 of the Apache Rocks Permit Revision. <br />All of the mining panels evaluated in this report aze located in the B-seam and aze <br />• planned to be mined at a height of 12 feet. The Section 21 panels aze located in the <br />original 5-year permit azea; whereas, the Sections 26 and 27 panels aze located in the <br />Apache Rocks permit revision azea. <br />• <br />PANEL LAYOUT REVISIONS <br />The revised panel layouts for Section 21 and Sections 26 and 27 are shown in Figure 1. <br />In Section 21, the original three-panel configuration has been changed to two panels of <br />longer length. The key parameters corresponding to the original and revised layouts aze <br />summarised in Table 1. The panels are numbered from east to west. A compazison of <br />the parameters shows that the panel widths remain the same, the panel lengths increase <br />slightly, and the overburden thickness of the panels for the two layouts are compazable. <br />rig r arer Engineers, nc. 83 -037.21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.