Laserfiche WebLink
~ - <br />It appears the existing bond was set much higher than it would be <br />set now because in 1976 costs were calculated on the entire <br />project rather than on maximum disturbance at any one time. In <br />addition, the operator was required to add a 15 percent state <br />overhead charge which the Attorney General's office later ruled <br />against. <br />Yours truly, <br />~~ ~ ~~ <br />Robert C. McAtee, President <br />RCM/amo <br />Enclosure <br />5 <br />