Laserfiche WebLink
Table 10 'and Figure 2 show the surface-water rights <br />potentially affected by NUC,LA EAST pit excavation. The <br />selection of these surf ace. rights was based on an analysis of <br />-drawdown resulting from pit excavation and a field inspection <br />of surface rights on March 15, 1988, as previously discussed. <br />The analysis showed that at the end of the Pifth year of <br />mining, the drawdown Erom the pit excavation may extend 0.7 <br />miles from the pit and produce a drawdown in the overburden <br />aquifer of approximately one foot at that distance from. the <br />pit. The field inspection showed the actual rights which <br />derived part of their water from~~perennial discharges from <br />the overburden:aquifer system. The surface rights that had <br />fl oci at the time.of the inspection (five months after the <br />flow~in the CC'ditdh system was stopped) were the rights that <br />were ~supplied,~~at least"in part,' by springs and seeps from <br />• 'the shallow .overburden aquifer and might therefore be <br />impacted by pit excavation. An estimate of the distribution <br />of the augmentation water to these rights was calculated as <br />follows: <br />1. 'The rights closer to the pit would experience <br />greater impact from raining. The impact was assumed <br />to be directly related to the drawdown at the <br />location of the water right. A factor equal to the <br />estimated drawdown at the location of the water right <br />divided by the sum of drawdowns at all rights was <br />26 <br />rcntvaNC ~..~ <br />• REVISED MARCH 2006 Attachment 2.05.3(3)-16-71 <br />