Laserfiche WebLink
<br />4 <br />'.. '.i <br />3. ITat sr id op7+11eation and impnet atntement nra <br />~.,~p:e tr in ea wepvcU: xecpC on Lercinaf ter noted, !: <br />accordance with the provisionc :.nd rtKlu iremanto of ::cation <br />x.07.07 and Section 9.07.07 of said resolution, and el+c <br />applicant has paid the required !ea Sn eha sum of 5:00.00 <br />(~ <br />].'.Shat the proposed lael]ity and all buildings and <br />siructnres proposed in eonnectlon theraroith era 1h~eomp li ante <br />rich all applicable zoning; subdivision, bui laling, health <br />and sanitation ragulstiona except Lor uxeeasi vc height over <br />the limit imposed by Section 7.07.07 of the Garfield County <br />Toni oaf Resolution end except for approvnl of a special use, <br />ss required by Section 7.07.07 of the Garfield County Zoning <br />Ibwlution. <br />1. Shat the Board must, for purposes of analyzing <br />the subject application against [I.e provisions of the Gerficldr <br />County Zoning Resolution, establish thr neighborhood which <br />may be affected by the possible gran ring of the proposed - <br />apeciel use ~pcrmit, and further that iha Ponrd has determined <br />tl+et, except as otherwise noted herein, •uch neighborhood <br />!s Lha~ ores of Garfield County, Colorado, South and Last <br />of the intersection of Colorodo Stott Ilighvay 87 with Ga rfiald: <br />County Rood 11~, and Nosth end Nest of the in'_orsertion of - <br />Colorado Stara Righrey B7 with Gs rf field County Road 106. <br />5. Shat the gencral~ehwrsctez of the neighborhood <br />of the tract proposed to be subject to the special vac permit <br />is agricultural and residential, with same limited costae rcial ~~ <br />uses, the only operations which may be eonatrued as industrial <br />being sand end gravel operations, with an associated concrete <br />batch plant and a ra ilroed line, all of which ere ooorat ad <br />in compliance with all applicable zoning, subdivision, building, <br />health and esaitation regulations, whether under special ase <br />permits or is the at stns of • non-conforming use. <br />6. That landowners adjacent to and in the area of <br />the subjeei property and the othor citizens of Garfield [Dusty <br />have indicated concern regarding the affect of the proposed coal- <br />loading, facility operations on the wgzicultural end residen- <br />tial nwtvra of the neighborhood, uyon the value of adjoining <br />properties and other propertiss in the area, mood upon other <br />sectors of the aconosy of the [Dusty iC limitstions regarding <br />height, location, and use oC the subject property •re not <br />impoaad. <br /> <br />7. Shat a atroetvre for the handling and/or atozaec <br />of natural resources greater than fif iy-five feet in he igtit <br />mould create •n impact injurious in terns of proper t)• values, <br />ens economy, and seseheic• upon tho character of tie neighScr- <br />hood mould require that the eliernntive design for a 770-co- <br />27i-foot high coal loading facility and a 170-to-175-foot <br />high coal .lading facility be disapproved, bui 'that em+l !test's <br />proposal for o loading structure no more than fif:y-fi:•c <br />feet Sn height to ba located on the subject prop~rcy may <br />be permitted without endangvrinq the henlth, setety, and <br />welfare of the population and uaos oL the neighborhncd ar <br />rove district if ea rtain eondieions more fully ctatee herein <br />arc complied with by the ep~licent. Tho proposal of the <br />wpylic:ant prasnnted nt tt+e Itoord'^ public hearing on the <br />lath day oC wpril, 1980, anA employing a low<linq atruc ~urc <br />not sxer• inq [~-five feet in hnf nht togcihcr ri t:+ rr. <br />soeaated truce dump, veyor, railrond ernckage, a-d <br />associated uses, shall here! ref ter be referred to, Co Chc <br />exclusion of eppliennt.'s nrolnsals [or fneili ties in excess <br />of LS Lty-floc feet in heiyht. as 'ihc fneility'. , <br />.1 <br />_7_ <br />t., <br />