My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE130956
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE130956
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:31:49 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 10:48:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
Slope Stability Analysis of the Sediment Pond Embankments
Section_Exhibit Name
NH2 1996 Section 2.05.3(3) Attachment 2.05.3(3)-10 Part 8
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 3. Strength Parameters Used in Slooe Stability Analysis <br />Based on Table 1 and the density tests, the soil materials for this analysis will have the <br />following strength parameters: <br />Embankment (classified as an SM-SC soil) <br />a) maximum dry density 119 Ibs/cu.ft (this is conservative since the actual test showed a much <br />higher density) <br />b) as compacted cohesion of 0.14 tons per square foot or 280 Ibs/sq.ft. (This is the low end of <br />the range in Table 1) <br />c) friction angle of 30 degrees. (This is also the low end of the range in Table 1). <br />Foundation (classified as an GM soil) <br />a) maximum dry density 82 Ibs/cu.ft (this is slightly lower than the actual test dennity) <br />b) as compacted cohesion of 0.0 tons per square foot or 0 Ibs/sq.ft. (See Table 1) <br />• c) friction angle of 33 degrees. (This is also below the low end of the range in Table 1). <br />Due to the possibility of different soils being present for both the dam and the foundation <br />material, various cases will be run with different strength parameters to account for any soil <br />type which could be encountered. <br />Since the slopes of the pond are mild (2.5:1) and the height is no greater than 10.0 feet, it is <br />shown that any possible combination of strength parameters will attain the long-term safety <br />factor of 1.3, therefore, no triaxial shear testing of the material has been done. Also, it would be <br />very difficult to get a representative sample from all the pond areas in question, therefore <br />varying cases would need to run regardless of the results of any single test. <br />4. Other Parameters Used in the Slooe Stability Analysis <br />The program SB-SLOPE was used to analyze the slope stability, which uses the Bishops <br />method of slices for cylindrical failure. It is not possible that the dam and foundation for this <br />• case would result in a plane failure therefore, this failure type will not be studied. Map 1 shows <br />(Revised 12/00) Attachment 2.05.3(3) -10-113 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.