My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE130842
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE130842
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:31:44 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 10:42:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/20/2003
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 13 Postmining Land Use
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
site and mountain loam range site, estimated range cond~i lion for the mixed brush and <br />sagebrush types occurring in the area is only fair. The brushy Loem range site equates to <br />the mountain brush vegetation type, while the mountain loam range site is similar to the <br />sagebrush type. The deteriorated range condition is rtrflected in a higher density o~f <br />shrubs at the expense of the herbaceous component. .4c cording to SCS range site <br />descriptions and analysis of regional baseline vegetation date, shrub densities rosy be two <br />to four times higher than the allowable amounts for optimum range condition. Aspen stands <br />have also been affected by livestock grazing, particularly sheep grazing. The aspen <br />stands in the permit area are characterized by a poor undo r::t ory vegetation and a distinct <br />lack of regeneration. Existing stands are dominated by a~a iure and decadent trees. These <br />observations ere consistent with [hose in other areas of the west (DeByle and Winokur, <br />1985). <br />while diminished range condition can be attributed to livestock grazing, it is further <br />compounded by the ecological characteristics of [he woody plan[ communities and the <br />livestock and big game utilization patterns occurring in these communities. The woody <br />component in these communities readily increases when the herbaceous component is reduced <br />in vigor or eliminated. The mountain brush type represents well established clonal <br />communities that are readily capable of exploiting opportunities for expansion in the <br />presence of perturbations to herbaceous vegetation such as overgrazing. Similarly, <br />snowberry and sagebrush will occupy niches formerly occupied by herbaceous species. <br />Tisdale and Hironaka (1981), in an extensive review of the literature on the sagebrush <br />grassland region, found overall use of sagebrush by wildlife and livestock combined was <br />generally light. This resulted in minimal impact to sagebrush, especially in relation to <br />the associated herbaceous component. They also found sagebrush stands have a strong <br />competitive edge once herbaceous competition is reduced. <br />Cattle and sheep do not graze in the permit area during the winter months, thus <br />eliminating any winter browsing of woody species by livestock. Livestock grazing begins <br />in late May or early June. During the summer months, both cattle and sheep center their <br />foraging preferences on the more nutritious and palatable herbaceous species. While some <br />browsing of the woody species by livestock does occur during the summer, it is generally <br />limited because of the availability of more palatable heerbaceous species. This grazing <br />selection has favored the woody component in these native strands. <br />The highest use of browse by big game is expected to occur during the winter months when • <br />13-2 Revised 01/75/93 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.