My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE130630
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE130630
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:31:32 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 10:33:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/30/2007
Doc Name
Reclaimed San Miguel Power Drainage Channel Design
Section_Exhibit Name
Section 2.05.4(2)(c) Attachment 2.05.4(2)(c)-3
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />• <br />r1 <br />U <br />New Horizon 2 <br />Reclaimed San Miguel Power Drainage Channel Design <br />Introduction <br />The design of the reclaimed drainage channel in the New Horizon 2 permit area was based on <br />DMG regulations for conveyance of overland flow of watersheds less than one square mile. The <br />reclaimed channel is shown on Map 2.05.4-2 between points CC to CC'. The premine drainage <br />channel slope is 3.70 percent and the postmining drainage channel will be 3.70 percent. <br />Design <br />For the design of this reclaimed channel, the SEDCAD + model was used to predict runoff from <br />the watershed (see Attachment C). A 10-year, 24-hour precipitation event was used in the design. <br />The peak flow was determined at the downstream end of the drainage channel. Following is a fist <br />of main input factors. <br />Input Channel CC-CC' <br />Precipitation 2.0 in <br />Drainage Area 89.26 ac <br />CN 81 <br />L 2300 ft <br />Y 85 ft <br />Output <br />Q 32.55 cfs <br />Based on this discharge, SEDCAD+ was used to design the reclaimed drainage channel bottom <br />width based on Manning's equation calculation. The shape of the channel was assumed to be <br />trapezoidal with 10h:1 v side slopes. The channel bottom width was increased to insure that the <br />(Revised July 2006) ATTACHMENT 2.05.4(2)(C)- 3-1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.