My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE130584
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE130584
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:31:30 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 10:32:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981016
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
Aquatic Resources
Section_Exhibit Name
APPENDIX D CONTINUED
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
beak <br />• <br />AQUATIC RESOURCES INVESTIGATION <br />1.0 INTRODUCTION <br />Beak Consultants Incorporated (BEAK) was retained by Western Slope Carbon <br />Incorporated (WSC) to assess the aquatic biological resources of the North Fork <br />Gunnison River relative to WSC's Hawk's Nest Mine permit area in west-central <br />Colorado. BEAK developed this program to be responsive to the Colorado Mines <br />Land Reclamation Board's regulations for coal mining (1980) and the Office of <br />Surface Mining's Permanent Regulatory Program for Surface Coal Mining and <br />Reclamation Operations (1979). <br />The principal objectives of the investigation were to inventory the exis- <br /> <br />ting aquatic biota and assess aquatic resource and habitat quality in the per- <br />mit area. Atrophic level approach to sampling the aquatic community was <br />utilized. Studies included in-field and laboratory water quality determina- <br />tions, aquatic habitat and channel stability evaluations, and assessments of <br />periphyton (attached algae), benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish resources. <br />In the following text, these components are discussed separately although <br />pertinent relationships are pointed out. <br />Information for each study component was derived from a review of the <br />• <br />existing literature and on-site field sampling. A preliminary review indicated <br />that site-specific data on aquatic resources of the permit area were dated or <br />lacking; therefore, a one-week site survey was recommended and subsequently <br />conducted by BEAK November 10-14, 1980. This allowed a site-specific assess- <br />ment of aquatic resources during crucial conditions of low flow and declining <br />temperatures when ambient stresses on aquatic organisms are particularly high <br />and sampling efficiency is maximized (Hynes 1970, Merrit and Cummins 1978, <br />Vibert 1967). <br />1-I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.