My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE130550
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE130550
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:31:28 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 10:31:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
Continued from Vol 2
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 06 CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL RESOURCE INFORMATION
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Bottom to survey Route B. The river crew was picked up at the <br />end of the day at Round Bottom by the vehicle crew. This proce- ~~ <br />dure was used for three days and it is estimated that five or <br />six man-days were saved by using the raft. <br />The site designation system used during the investiga- <br />tion is one employed by all professional archeologists working <br />in the United States. Using site number 5MF435 as an example, <br />the first numeral "5" is the number assigned to the state of <br />Colorado. The letters "MF" indicate that the site is located <br />in Moffat County, and the numbers following the county designa- <br />tion mean that it is the 435th site recorded in Moffat County. <br />A block of unused site numbers was obtained from the Office of <br />the State Archeologist prior to field investigation. The cri- <br />teria used to determine whether a particular find should be made •~ <br />a site was six flakes in the case of open lithic sites. If fewer <br />than six flakes were found, the find was labelled an "isolated <br />find" or "IF" and numbered consecutively from 1 to n. Thus, <br />IF36 was the 36th isolated find made during the investigation. <br />Obviously, site criteria will vary somewhat depending on the <br />situation. Isolated projectile points were also labelled as IFs <br />but if found in association with several flakes or other arti- <br />facts, the collection was given a site designation. <br />Sites were described as either open lithic sites, rock- <br />shelters or historic sites during the field investigation. The <br />usual practice of describing sites as chipping stations, camFsites, <br />etc. before material from the sites is ar.alvzed was avoided since it <br />is felt that these initial identifications may bias the analyst. •J <br />t <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.