My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE130522
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE130522
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:31:27 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 10:29:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1990144
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/11/1991
Doc Name
M 90-144 FILLMORE PIT
From
SOUTHWAY CONSTRUCTION CO INC
To
MLRD
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT D E H L
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• ~ • • III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />sss <br />~~~ a ea, ~.~. <br />117 WHIfE PINE DRNE <br />ALAMOSA, COLORADO 81101 Off. Phone (719) 589-5103 <br />BUTCH SOUfHWAY °araeounr. ovroe7vNnYenfr[.orerr" Res. Phone (719) 589-6868 <br />February 8, 1991 RECE[VE~ <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />137.3 Sherman St., Room z1s FEB 11 ~gg~ <br />Deaver, CO 80203 <br />Attn: Gregg squire Mined Land <br />Reclamation Division <br />Gentlemen: RE: M 90-144 <br />Fillmore Pit <br />Thee following is our answer to your concerns expressed in <br />your edequecy letter of February 1 1991: <br />EXHIBIT D - MINING PLAN <br />We agree that a better seed mixture for temporary topsoil <br />stockpiles is appropriate and agree to the following <br />mir:ture: <br />Western wheatgrass 12 PLS/acre <br />Thickspike wheatgrass 10 PLS/ecre <br />Alfalfa (Ladek) 2 PLS/acre <br />EXHIBIT E - RECLRMRTION <br />All. daylighted slopes on the East side of the pit adjacent <br />to wetlend areas will be sloped back into the disturbed <br />Brea. No water from the disturbed Brea will flow onto the <br />wetlands. <br />EXHIBIT H - WILDLIFE INFORMATION <br />We will agree to a 200 foot buffer instead of the 100 foot <br />bui'fer near the wetland erects. We intend to keep a lerger <br />bui'fer but have found extreme differences in individual <br />cor~cepta of what constitutes a wetland end differences in <br />dii'ferent government agencies ideas of what constitutes a <br />wetland. If we maintain a 300 foot buffer from whet we <br />bel-ieve is a wetland we can probably guarantee that all <br />parties will agree that at least a 200 foot buffer exists. <br />We will flag the buffer limit to keep our men and equipment <br />out; of the area, we know the property does use the wetland <br />area and we have no control over his use of his property. <br />EXHIBIT L - RECLAMRTION COSTS <br />We have not problem with inclusion of 15.18% indirect costs <br />intro our submitted figures. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.