Laserfiche WebLink
Table 3.6-1. Percent Cover for the Sagebrush Community <br />. Surface <br /> Refe[e nce Area Facilities Area <br /> Shrubs 26.3 91.0 <br /> Forbs 9.1 1.3 <br /> Gcasses <br /> (perennial and annual) 25.2 32.6 <br /> Total 60.6 74.9 <br />Table 3.6-2. Species Diversity <br />Species diversity as represented by the relative cover of the major species <br />present in [he sagebrush vegetation type and reference area. <br />Percent Relative Cover <br />Species Sa ebrush T e Re feRe re <br />Arteme sla trident ata <br />Agropy ron sm1th11 2.0 4.3 <br />Agropyron cri s[atum 9.8 28.1 <br />_ Si [anion by ste rSx 5.4 2.B <br />Pca fendle ri ana 4.4 1.0 <br />Roele ria crl st ata 3.4 1.0 <br />Astragu lus crasslcarpus 1.4 8.9 <br />Bromus tectorum 19.5 3.B <br />3.6,2.2.2 Production Data <br />• Production samples were collected utilizing the double sampling <br />technique on both the previously proposed disposal area and <br />reference area. Double sampling or regression sampling is a method <br />for determining vegetative production where plots are both clipped <br />and estimated. In this method, only a relatively few plots are <br />physically sampled and all plots estimated for production by visual <br />means. Relationships between the two sample groups are determined <br />from regression equations and the clipped production values are <br />then predicted for those plots where biomass production was only <br />estimated. <br />Along the transects in the sagebrush community, 1 sq. meter <br />circular plots were placed every 10 meters. Within the plots, <br />utilizable forage (i.e., all above-ground biomass for grasses and <br />forb; leaves and green twigs for shrubs) was estimated by species. <br />In one of every four plots sampled, the biomass was clipped, bagged <br />and weighed in the field. In addition to providing the basis for <br />. the regression analysis, this also provided a check for the field <br />NCEC - Coal Ridge $1 3-67 ABC/1145/900301 <br />