My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE130306
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE130306
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:31:17 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 10:17:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 23 SUBSIDENCE INFORMATION
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />subsidence area is 350. In other studies in geologic structures <br />similar to that present at the Dorchester Mine, angles from 200 <br />to 250 have been observed (DUnrud, 1976; and Abel and Lee, 1980). <br />The angle of draw at the Dorchester Mine is, therefore, expected <br />to range between 20 and 250. However, the monitoring plan which <br />was proposed by Dorchester will measure subsidence effects at <br />angles of up to 350 to determine the site specific angles which <br />will result. The results will then be utilized to predict areal <br />extent of anticipated subsidence. Where necessary, buffer zones <br />will also be predicted using the areal extent. <br />2.6 - Effects of Subsidence on Existing Structures <br />(RULE 2.05.6(6)(e)(ii)) <br />The expected effects/impacts to the existing structures, <br />• <br />presented in Section 1.1, as results of the predicted worst case <br />subsidence, is presented in the sections which follow. The <br />actual subsidence, surface strains and areal extent is expected <br />to be significantly less but cannot accurately be predicted at <br />this time. Therefore, effects are based on calculated subsidence <br />and strains presented with the realization that actual impacts <br />will be significantly less than indicated by the theoretical <br />predictions. <br />To assess the subsidence effects, there must first be an <br />assessment of the expected magnitude of the anticipated <br />subsidence effects to determine if material subsidence damage or <br />diminution of reasonably foreseeable use will occur. <br />Material subsidence damage, as defined by the Regulations, <br />C~ <br />means, changes to structures which make it technologically or <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.