PART Q
<br />Page No. 30
<br />Permit No.: CO-0029599
<br />B. RESPONSIBILITIES
<br />16. Antibackslidfnt; • '
<br />a. A ppermit mayy not be renewed, reissued, or modified to contain effluent limitations adopted pursuant to Section 25-8-
<br />503(I)(b) (BPJ) of the Water Quality Control Act, which are less stringent than the comparable effluent limitations or
<br />standazds N the prevtous perm[[, unless any one of the fallowing exceptions is met and the conditions of paragraph (c}
<br />of this section are met:
<br />i) Material and substantial alterations or additions to the permitted facility occurred after permit issuance which
<br />Justify the application of less stringent effluent limitations; or
<br />ii) Information rs available which was mot available at the time of permit issuance (other than revised regulations,
<br />guidance, or test methods) and which would have justified the application of a less sringent effluent 1unitation or
<br />standard at the time of permit issuance; or
<br />iii) The Division determines that technical mistakes or mistaken intetpretatioas of law were made in issuing the
<br />permit, which justified relaxation of the effluent limitations or standazds; or
<br />iv) A less stringent effluent limitation or standard is necessary because of events over which [he permittee has qo
<br />control and for which there is no[ reasonable available remedy; or
<br />v) The permittee bas received a permit variance; or
<br />vr) The permittee has installed the treatment facilities required to meet the effluent limitations in the previous permit
<br />and bas pproperly operated and maintained the facilities but has nevertheless been unable to achieve the previous
<br />effluent linuta[ions, m which case, the limitations in the renewed, reissued, or modified permit may reflect the
<br />level of pollutant control actually achieved (but shall not be less stringent than required by effluent guidelines in
<br />effect at the time of permit renewal, reissuance, or modification).
<br />b. A permit ma not be renewed, reissued, or modified to contain effluent limitations adopted pursuant to 61.8(2(b) or
<br />(c) of the Colorado Discharge Permit System Regulations that are less stringent than the comparable effluent .
<br />limitations itt the previous permit, unless any of the exceptions provided herein is met and the conditions of paragraph
<br />c. of this section aze met.
<br />i) In waters where the applicable water quality standard has not yet been attained, effluent limitations based on a
<br />total maximum daily load or other waste load allocation may be revised to be less stringent if the cumulative effect
<br />of all such revisions assures attainment of such water quality standard, or the designated use which is not being
<br />attained is removed w accordance with Section 31.6 of the Basic Standards.
<br />ii) [n waters where the applicable water yualiry standard has been anained, effluent limitations based on a total
<br />maximum daily load, other waste load allocation, or any other permitting standazd (including any water qual
<br />standard) may be revised to be less stringent if such revision rs subject to and consistent with the azttidegrada
<br />provisions of Sectiom 31.8 of the Basic Standards. Consistency with Section 3l .8 shall be presumed if the waters
<br />m question have been designated by the Commission as "use protected"; or
<br />iii) Whether or not the applicable water quality standazd has been attained:
<br />(A) Material and substantial alterations or additions to the permitted facility occurred after permit issuance which
<br />justified the application of less stringent effluent limitations; or
<br />(B) A less stringeat effluent limitation is necessary because of events over which the permittee has no control and
<br />for which there is not reasonable available remedy; or
<br />C)) The permittee has received a permit variance; or
<br />~D) The permittee has itutalled the treatment facilities required to meet the effluent limitations in the previous
<br />pertrut and has properly operated and maintained the facilines but has nevertheless been unable to achieve the
<br />previous effluent lunitauons, m which case, the limitations in the reviewed, reissued, or modified ppeermit may
<br />reflect the level of pollutant control actually achieved (but shall not be less stringent than requ'ved by effluent
<br />guidelines in effect at the time of permit renewal, reissuance, or modification).
<br />c. In no event may a permit with respect, to which paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section apply be renewed, reissued, or
<br />modified to contain an effluent limitation or standard which is less strmgeat than required by federal effluent
<br />gguidelines in effect at the time the permit is renewed, reissued, or modified. In no event may such a permit to
<br />dscharge into state waters be renewed, reissued, or modified to contain a less stringent effluent Iimrtatton rf the
<br />implementation of such limitation would result in a violation of an applicable water quality standazd.
<br />17. ERect of Permit Issuance
<br />a. The issuance of a permit does not convey any propery rights or any exclusive privilege.
<br />b. The issuance of a permit does not authorize any injury to person or property or any invasion of personal rights, nor
<br />does it authorize the infringement of federal, state, or local laws or regulations.
<br />c. Except for any toxic effluent standard or prohibition imposed under Section 307 of the Federal act or any standard for
<br />sewage sludge use or dis sal under Sectton 405(d) of the Federal act, compfiance with a permit during its term
<br />constitutes compliance, fo~purposes of enforcement, with Sections 301, 302, 306, 318, 403, and 405(a) and (b) of the
<br />Federal act. However, a permit may be modified, revoked and reissued, or terminated during its term for cause
<br />fork in Section 61.8(8) of the Colorado Discharge Penni[ System Regulations.
<br />d. ComPPfiance with a permit condition which implements a pariculaz standard for sewage sludge use or disposal shall be
<br />an afTirnative defense in any enforcement action brought for a vtolation of that standard for sewage sludge use or
<br />disposal.
<br />
|