My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE130077
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE130077
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:31:03 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 10:08:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977210
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/18/1977
From
COLO COLLEGE
To
MLRB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />THE COLORADO COLLEGE <br />COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO 60903 <br />October 17, 1977 <br />Colorado Mining Reclamation Board <br />1313 Sherman St. <br />Denver, CO, 80203 <br />Ladies and Gentlemen: <br /> <br />Ot;7 1 61971 <br />Cui;;. J~'Pi. cf fi~tura! P.esc^rces <br />I am writing to you in connection with the forthcoming Hearings pertaining to <br />the quarrying operations along the Front Range in the Pikes Peak reg:.on. <br />I would urge the following considerations on you: <br />1. In past years, in Public Hearings before the County Commissioners and other public <br />bodies,.Castle Concrete has made official statements that are at variance with <br />what the firm is presently requesting. <br />2, In my judgment, shared by many others, the reclamation efforts to date have been <br />totally ineffective. <br />3. When I served on the Colorado Springs City Council, we were taken on a tour of the <br />so-called Snyder quarry, and were assured that virtually none of i:he stripping <br />operations would be visible from the Pikes Peak region; that they shuld be shielded <br />by bermiag,etc, This has not been done. <br />4. While I understand that certain details of blsinese operations have: to be kept <br />confidential, it is not at all clear to me why reclamation time schedules and <br />proposed expenditures for reclamation purposes fall into that catE:gory. I believe <br />the public has a full right to know what is being proposed. <br />5. I believe that there should be a reasonable time limit on permits,. Thus, the issue <br />of extending permits should be subject to reconsideration within eI reasonable time <br />frame, and extension of permits should be contingent on performan<:e of what had <br />been promised in the way of reclamation the last time. <br />6. Finally, I urge you strongly to hold the Public Hearing on this i:;sue in Colorado <br />Springs. The firm, its representatives and its attorneys will have: no difficulty <br />travelling to Denver; but dozens of citizens who are vitally concerned would find <br />this difficult and time-consuming. I would urge th-~t the Hearings be held at a timA <br />and place which would enable members of the affected community to participate <br />effectively. <br />S' ce~ely y~µrs, <br />~~_ <br />Fred :. _°ondermann <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.