My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE129986
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE129986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:30:56 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 8:30:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 07a STABILITY INVESTIGATION OF THE TWENTYMILE SANDSTONE CLIFF
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />'• 4.3.1 All Hazard Zones <br />The joints for all the hazard zones are shown in a combined plot in Figure 6. The <br />1 upper diagram is the scatter diagram comprised of 160 joint orientations. The lower diagram <br />is the Schmidt equal area plot. <br />The Schmidt plot in this diagram is contoured using the following convention: <br />1 % contour designated by + <br />2% contour designated by 1 <br />4% contour designated by 2 <br />6% contour designated by 3 <br />8% contour designated by M <br />l <br />The strongest set, as might be expected, is the bedding plane joint set with a <br />~i maximum concentration of 8.7% and an average orientation of 345/7. Some scatter was <br />observed in the field due to rolls in the bedding and some scatter is seen on the plot. This <br />set is fairly "tight" and suggests a high degree of uniformity for the joint patterns along the <br />entire length of outcrop that was mapped (i.e. Hazard Zones 1 through 6). <br />Seven reasonably strong sets of joints (including the bedding plane joints) can be <br />seen on this plot, which have a concentration of 4% or higher. There are two weaker sets. <br />The joint sets are defined in Table 2, and included in Table 3 along with the joint sets <br />determined for the individual zones. <br />4.3.2 Hazard Zones 1 throuPh 4 <br />~ Only 46 joints were mapped in Hazard Zones 1 through 4. The main reason was <br />! due to a lack of outcrops for Zones 1, 3 and 4, the presence of slumped zones (these were <br />J not mapped, since these joints orientations had been disturbed), and the sparsity of accessible <br />J• 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.