PERMFILE129934 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

3. Because objections were received during the comment periods, the matter was set for a formal Boazd hearing pursuant to Constmction Materials Rule ("Rule") 1.7.4(2). 4. The Boazd has jurisdiction over the parties and this matter pursuant to Sections 34-32.5- 104, 34-32.5-105 and 34-32.5-114 of the Colorado Land Reclamation Act for the Extraction of Constmction Materials, Section 34-32-5-101 et seq. C.R.S. (2005) ("Act"). 5. On Apri125, 2006, a hearing officer appointed by the Board conducted a prehearing conference in Cedaredge, Colorado pursuant to Rules 2.6 and 2.7. As a result of the prehearing conference, the prehearing conference officer prepazed a proposed prehearing conference order. In addition to the Applicant, parties who appeazed at the prehearing "' ' conference included Frances P. Lazeaz, Janet'Croissant, Louan Lundberg Gregory D. """ ''`Lazeaz, Larry Chick, Dr. James Hudson, Patricia Gazdner, Bill Welch, Lee and Joyce Garman, Patricia Crader, Rex and Renata Replogle, Paul Peter and Patricia Urone, Paul A. and Verla H. Priest, all of whom are members of the Coalby Canyon Association. All other objectors failed to appeaz and thus lost their party status pursuant to Rule 2.7.3(4). At the Formal Boazd Hearing on May 10, 2006, the Board approved the proposed prehearing conference order. While all of the individuals at the prehearing conference did not attend the Formal Board Hearing, they were all represented at the Forma] Board Hearing through the Coalby Canyon Association and its attorney, Ms. Potter, and through its designated representatives, Verla Priest, Janet Croissant, Bill Welch and Greg Lazeaz. 7. The issues set forth in the prehearing order, as revised, are: A. Is the information submitted with the application accurate and complete for the following items (Rule 1.4.1(3): (1). the pre-mining land use and site description; and D..~....... D..,.,. TR'1(1(1C /1'11