|
~ ~
<br />~
<br />~ RAN CH
<br />O HOMES O BUSINESS O RECREA
<br />N O 1N VE57M EN7 PR OPER7Y
<br />.:
<br />rr ~ /''/ ~C - y ~ V V V V E7 V V C7U ~ V CJ F_J
<br />~ ~3 ~~~`'~~ '=goo ~ ...w ..:
<br />LYNN K. WHITEMAN x - `' r"i".''4'i~[:y"'-+".ii•:', ~':3d ;;b.,•-~.~i•'l .:f©OX 117 ~--921 .77H 6TReET.
<br />878-8108 OR 87B•d472 ~ ..~ ~ .. ~£."~+••C s=',4'~',,: ~~-•1'"c,.w;; ._ r :'`.r__; ~'aY EEKER:LOL0: 61G341•~~:
<br />.. ~ ~`i"r'Ci~~,ity a-f'r.J~.~'Y. f i r ~ r r - - _
<br />' '' J__~I fnC4ti_; r y4•: - _~'('~':~i: !E.i'•..p~•_-5~-'. t .
<br />, - _ , -~ -'~„~i. ;; sopp L{. ;p { -7 "vs. . i.~Lir.1•~--r .~. =ic. T~:f J'~"••''•
<br />..: ~.4'.: .. '.'YyZ~': ~' L<"'', if.. mod. ~. .-Iy ..
<br />. ''', [,•.. ', /, -.y'A YL~~..vt" ,~y'.+"E. f`' Y:Y•. - ~JI` y~•.. 1~,1 _:'Y ~'. .' :,•
<br />... •. ~ .. ~ .••'..: .4;q J.~. ~~~}.w ~; 41-?'ti.i-f`r:~'~~ oa. ~4., •'`' - :;r .~a~;w.55; .; J., "l x.'. .~:
<br />.OC tOber,:23 o'::'1981..:-r:~ .. ~~~~_~ ',r.=:r ,.f1 't-~.
<br />,.:
<br />..
<br />-,... '
<br />Mr. and Mrs, Rick Rodriguez''~'~' ~. -, ~~ ~- ~•~ • '-- "~': `''~~
<br />4487 County Road ,9 ~ - "' . y -~," ,Y• ' .~
<br />Meeker, Coloradorr-:.01691 .-.,. ` * =~~ --'.,:' ','" -'.
<br />Dear Mr, and F4rrs; ~Rodrig - . `; "" ~-; •_' :: ' _'' .
<br />At your request` S have given `:evaluation''to your-:concern,;x23ative`.<
<br />to the compatibility of rural..residential•property;and :those`: pro:- •;~~'
<br />perty values. as they xelate'to.being'adjacent:.to.a..heavy,industri'a1••
<br />use, You have indicated to "me .and 'I: concur ~that~.the`:present:useof:' ~~
<br />your present property and home which was built :in 1981.'wtiuld be';°
<br />considered rural residential and :the balance of .the :land: which~you:"'_!
<br />now own, those presently used for '-agricuituial purposes .would : ~' .: - .~
<br />probably have a higher and better use as rural .residential-p since'' .
<br />its size is no longer sufficient-to be'..an economical agricultural' ;
<br />unit. It .is my ;opinion.that~rural residential land..use..and,-Yieavy:~.~-
<br />industrial use. many:.times:are.~notibompatible._uses depending.!.upon • ~'.. • ..
<br />~,.
<br />the density of rural residential rand :the. type of heavy `iiidustr:i31".
<br />use that may be adjacent,:":Since;the•anticipated-heavy:;industrial~- ~.:;~~`
<br />„ ,.,
<br />use would be the'development=°o~a:graver;pit arid':associated'uses'-=-:;`~
<br />connected with _that.type°o£;:business:,iiic3uding,:gravel•,crushirig;_' ~'
<br />load out facilities;,asphal'~F~equpment'=,ands;,others•'i't,;would~appeaY;,:''.' ;
<br />to me that this• type of .hea~j';.aridustrial°~ise'would "have Nassocated„ ` ;
<br />with it certain:vieDual~an~.;ho'?~e_~ac~tori~~~Yiat',twouTdshave~;an,impaC~:
<br />upon rural residential.'~ropegg3~s'~ha~.,,aid::cid~aceat.-~~fie-~~uJ:]:,_ ~,;
<br />impact of this'lieavy 3ndusSc~ta'?.-use;3s~•unk_nown{..at`~.Yiis';~~:me:".anti
<br />would depend upon the•,~xY.~~i~_~o sahidh'~the;i>Eavp~:~ndustria3.-tise'-
<br />was operated, However';'i~:rtould"be~tiy opinion that~•ttie're,7[lay_,be~.,
<br />potential negative effects •Da future property values 'of -rural ':.,'',-',;~ ~- '
<br />residential property.: being adjacent to heavy industrial .uses .tha'E';,:~ ..`t
<br />were extensively -developed ~and`•long 'lived. As indicated =pr~viaus'1'y;• ,
<br />the amount of impact~~n.my opinion can not be determined;_ktidaya_~iu~".,
<br />feel that the concerns of compatibilitp..should be addressedrin•:cbri~'.
<br />sidering these types of uses in the same general area..r;=`~'-'L-•~~~:-.;;~,~'"
<br />If you have any ~questions..concerning ~fy opinion as it_xel'a~es-'to =';::.'•
<br />this matter, please feel fxee to contact;me,~„'~'; `"``''`~'{,:~;~,',-r:~','. ,
<br />' _ Sincerely;`':~;,_. ~,- },3 , ,. ~ :-t •'-' -
<br />•~~,-~J q' x ,i r
<br />}},,~~ i^ _ ., ~,. :RajW_liitemari. -..~{,e~, -
<br />LKWJjb .: ' ., i `-,L _ T 'r f ;?-~_ . o:.a-F ='i:r:: ~~'.i ~ 'eT.' -,_. _
<br />
|