My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE129522
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE129522
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:26:40 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 7:45:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2001046
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/10/2001
Doc Name
Adequacy Letter
From
DMG
To
Banks and Gesso LLC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
agreements under Exhibit S. Further, it is important to determine what the potential <br />impact to the surrounding area is so that structures or systems that are outside of the <br />sphere of influence aze not included unnecessarily. <br />The division is aware that the applicant has committed to instituting a well monitoring <br />program to determine if and when adverse impacts may occur. This will include <br />installation of monitoring wells on or around the permit azea as well as monitoring <br />existing wells. The division has a couple of suggestions with respect to such a plan. <br />First, since there is presently a pit operating north of what is identified as mine areas 3 <br />and 4, installation of monitoring wells south and east of that pit at regularly spaced <br />intervals could provide a good picture of how the groundwater table might be expected to <br />behave once mining begins on this site. These wells could be installed as soon as crops <br />aze off and monitoring could begin this fall. <br />Second, along this same line, it would be possible to change the mining sequence and <br />begin mining in "Mine Area 5" while conducting monitoring in "Mine Area 1" in an <br />attempt to better define the groundwater table behavior. There aze two existing irrigation <br />wells located on Nix property that could be monitored during this time along with <br />installing new monitoring wells in the "Mine Area 1". This would offer an opportunity to <br />implement mitigation of irrigation water, (assuming the wells are impacted) which is <br />probably going to be easier to implement than the potential impacts to trees or wetlands <br />that is likely to occur if mining begins in "Mine Area 1" or "Mine Area 3". This would <br />also allow the groundwater table under "Mine Area 1" to be manipulated by <br />experimenting with vazious recharge scenarios such as injection wells or infiltration <br />basins or infiltration trenches or some combination thereof that could prove useful if <br />monitoring demonstrates that the wetlands will be impacted. <br />With respect to the potential impact on surface and groundwater, these are merely <br />suggestions. However, the division is requiring more detailed information on the <br />potential impact of these systems so that additional analysis can be performed before a <br />decision on this application can be rendered. The specifics of what information is being <br />requested can be found in Exhibit G. <br />MINING METHODS <br />The proposal to mine the site with vertical highwalls creates some problems with respect <br />to stability, both during and after mining. The stability issue is discussed in more detail <br />under Exhibit 6.5 and depending on the results of a requested stability analysis, the <br />backfilled material may need to be placed in lifts and properly compacted in order to <br />achieve long-term stability. A second problem with this method is that it requires a <br />significant amount of backfill, some of which must be imported from off-site. <br />Importation and placement of this material can be very costly and is discussed in more <br />detail under Exhibit L. Bottom line is that the division will have to bond for this activity. <br />A possible alternative would be to mine the slopes at 2H:1 V, thereby, leaving the desired <br />post-mining slopes in place. The obvious down-side to this is that a lot of extractable <br />material remains in place once mining is completed. The division simply wants the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.