Laserfiche WebLink
- -,r <br />i <br />issioners have issued <br />islative intent of th <br />contrary to the Farmland Protection Policy Act. / <br />3. Mesa Co my Commissioners have granted conditional use permits <br />contrary t Public Law 95 - 87, sec 757.5. S~tC R ~ <br />4. Mesa Cou ty Commissioners have granted Condit' naT use pe~~mits <br />contrary to n agreement between The U. S., Gra Valley Water Users, <br />Public Servic and Orchard Mesa Irrigation Dis ict. <br />5. Mesa County Commissioners have issued <br />contrary to the legislative intent of the <br />Act. <br />6. Mesa County Cc <br />contrary to the 1 <br />7. Title 34 -32-11~ <br />permits can not be <br />the reclamation prc <br />regulations of the <br />RecTamzition issues <br />so doing, they will <br />n <br />~tional use permits <br />orado Air duality Control <br />conditional use permits <br />Mined Land Reclamation Act. <br />4) of the Mined La d Reclamation Act states that <br />ssued if any part of the proposed mining operation, <br />am, or the futu use is contrary to the laws or <br />to or the Uni d States. If Mined Land <br />e lamation per is without resolving the legality c= <br />be aiding and betting Mesa County Commissioners. <br />Let this letter confirm <br />conference in the form of a ~j1 <br />dated July 27, 1992. <br />Why did Mr. Humphries di <br />What is the reason for t <br />Mined Land Reclamation Act if <br />uphold its purpose? <br />my obje tions were presented at the informal <br />etter, with attachments, addressed to you, anc <br />ri~fninated against me? <br />Legislative Declaration (34-32-102) of the <br />i? Division or the Board are not required tc <br />What is the reason for pend g tax money to develop and publish <br />Mineral Rules and Regulatio s, the sell them, at an additional cost to the <br />same taxpayers, if divisio employe s are privileged to unilaterally and <br />spontaneously develop out ide arran ements that smack of ex parte action tc <br />resolve special interest 'ssues? <br />What is the reason first address'ng the Legislation Declaration in <br />these rules and regula ion if it is no the intent of the Division to folic- <br />them? <br />You are a prof sional paid to mana a these affairs according to law. <br />It is prudent to h e all legal question reviewed by the Attorney General <br />for legality to sa a costs later to defen faulty or clouded issues in <br />Court. <br />Thank You, <br />Charles L. Ca~pbell <br />286 33 Road <br />Palisade, Co. 81526 <br />-2- <br />