My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE129206
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE129206
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:26:17 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 7:14:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999002
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/18/1999
Doc Name
ADEQUACY OF THE APPLICATION
From
DMG
To
AMERICAN SODA LLC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Letter to Kurt Nielsen 6 April 18. 1999 <br />d) <br />e) <br />beneficial use; one of the beneficial post mining land uses selected for this site is wildlife habitat <br />and the establishment of an adequate number of woody stem plants is requisite to the <br />establishment of that use. Also, Rule 3.1.10(1) requires that vegetation established on reclaimed <br />land be "at least equal in extent of cover to the natural vegetation of the surrounding area." This <br />performance standard assures that designated shrub establishment areas will eventually provide <br />habitat equivalent or superior to existing shrub stands in the area. <br />DOW suggests in the enclosed letter that disturbance to areas of higher density canopy within <br />each mine panel be avoided to the extent possible. In accordance with Rule 6.4.20(18)(a), <br />please describe how this DOW recommendation will be implemented. In a related matter, it is <br />not clear from figure J-1 and the narrative provided in the application whether or not the <br />Ponderosa Pine remnant vegetation association will be a zone of no disturbance; please specify. <br />It is stated in Exhibit H to the permit application [hat occasional raptor surveys of the project <br />area will continue at the Piceance Site and that if functioning nests are identified in the <br />immediate vicinity measures would be taken to minimize impacts to the nesting birds. Please <br />specify a minimum frequency for the occasional surveys, describe the qualifications that will be <br />required for persons assigned to conduct the surveys, and commit to documenting the results of <br />surveys to DMG. If raptor nests are identified, American Soda should immediately consult with <br />BLM and DOW, and should report to DMG the measures to be taken to minimize disturbance to <br />the nesting birds. <br />9. It is not cleaz in the existing permit application what topsoil handling procedures will be employed <br />during road construction and reclamation. Will all road alignments, including minor roads to individual <br />well fields be stripped of topsoil over their entire width, including shoulders? Where will the topsoil <br />stripped from road alignments be stockpiled? <br />10. With the exception of the topsoil stockpiled from the facilities area, most of the topsoil piles at the <br />Piceance Site will be temporary, relatively small, and scattered in various locations (e.g., the individual <br />stockpiles at each well pad). In order to prevent inadvertent misuse or contamination of stockpiled <br />topsoil, each location where topsoil is stored should be clearly marked. <br />11. Reclamation Plan issues to be addressed are listed here. <br />a) It is stated in the reclamation plan that grading will restore areas to approximate original <br />topography to the extent possible. This grading standard is appropriate for the majority of the <br />disturbance areas at the Piceance site. However, there are areas where restoration to original <br />topography may not be appropriate. For example, establishment of sagebrush parks on selected <br />drill pads, as discussed in item 8.b. above, may be enhanced if some of the leveled drill pad <br />areas are retained in the reclaimed landscape. Also, when backfilling and regrading in steep <br />slope areas and for reconstruction of stream channels, it is not always appropriate to reestablish <br />original contours, and the goal of the grading plan should be to establish slopes that are not <br />steeper than 3:1 if possible. In accordance with Rule 6.4.5(2)(f)(i), please specify that the <br />maximum reclaimed slope gradient will be 3: l or as shallow as physical constraints allow where <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.