My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE128955
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE128955
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:26:03 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 6:52:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/4/2002
Doc Name
USFS Statement of Fact
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 80 Drilling Activities - MR270
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• allowed them immediate use of roads across the Forest to access the area, and authorized them to <br />construct pads for drilling the boreholes. <br />Drilling and installing the boreholes required access across, and constructing drill pads on, <br />NFSL. Primary access was available on existing Forest roads, FDR 711 (Dry Fork of Minnesota <br />Creek) and FDR 711.2A (Apache Rocks). Snow plowing needed to occur on these roads, along <br />with road maintenance to accommodate drilling equipment. A portion of the access to the <br />primary drill site required upgrading an abandoned drill road. New spur access was needed to <br />reach some of the drill pads, and totaled about 1,00 feet of new disturbance. . <br />IV. RATIONALE FOR APPROVAL <br />The decision to allow MCC use of NFSL was based on several criteria which included: 1) the <br />area needing to be accessed lay within a Federal Coal lease held by MCC, 2) the azea needing to <br />be accessed lay within the State-approved permit azea for the West Elk Mine, 3) the potential for <br />impact to azchaeological sites and wildlife habitat was deemed low, 4) the potential local social <br />and economic impact that could occur should MCC not be allowed to evaluate and remedy the <br />situation, and ~) that MCC would be responsible for any reclamation measures needed to restore <br />the land. <br />Additional information for each of the above-mentioned items is provided below: <br />• 1. MCC holds several active Federal coal leases that give them right of entry to the coal <br />reserves. The azea accessed for the thermal event drilling lies within Federal Coal Lease C-1362. <br />This lease was readjusted in January 1997 based on requirements of the Federal Coal Leasing <br />Amendments Act (1975). At that time, the GMUG attached stipulations to the lease to bring it in <br />to conformance with the GMUG Forest Plan. At the time of lease readjustment, it was <br />acknowledged that, "[e]xploration...associated with coal mining could cause disturbances to <br />wintering elk and their habitat. All impacts will be mitigated after the application of <br />stipulations." The azea where the drilling took place lies within a zone where controlled surface <br />use (CSU) and timing stipulations aze in effect. The CSU stipulation allows for unscheduled <br />surface use in emergency situations, with notice and coordination with the Forest Service. The <br />timing stipulation disallows surface use from December 1 and Apri130, however it does provide <br />for surface use in emergency situations (including drilling) with authorization from the Forest <br />Service (Reference BLM, 1997). The District Wildlife Biologist was consulted at the onset of <br />the drilling project, and indicated that access and surface use would not have adverse impacts to <br />wildlife, including no affect on the lynx as the azea does not contain suitable habitat. <br />2. The Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology administers coal mining permits under the <br />authority of the Surface Mining Reclamation and Control Act of 1977. The area accessed for the <br />thermal event drilling lies within the State-approved permit azea for the West Elk Mine. The <br />mine permit requires the operator to adhere to performance and reclamation standazds enforced <br />by the State. Where the permit azea encompasses NFSL, Forest Service concurrence to the mine <br />permit is required. The GMUG has concurred to the current permit. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.