My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE128845
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE128845
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:25:57 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 6:43:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEYS 008 POND TR 12
Section_Exhibit Name
TAB 05 APPENDIX 5-3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
17 <br />present allow it, each site can be assigned to a temporal/ <br />• cultural period. Site type and function can also be derived <br />from the attributes recorded. To test the hypotheses <br />given above, the inventory will note the presence and <br />location of all cultural resources. The site type, function, <br />--` features, and artifacts present will also be described <br />and evaluated. <br />6.0 METHODOLOGIES <br />The following section describes the field and laboratory <br />methods used in the cultural resources investigation. <br />6.1 FIELD METHODS <br />The project area contains approximately 180 acres. Of <br />this amount, at least 408 (72 acres) was covered by intensive <br />pedestrian survey, using transects spaced 30 m apart. <br />This portion of the total acreage represents the terrain <br />with less than 90o slopes, and consists principally of <br />ridgetops, valley floors, and relatively gentle toeslopes. <br />The west side of the large sandstone outcrop in the NW1 /4NW1 /4 <br />of Section 7 presents a continuously vertical wall or <br />cliff, some 50 feet high by 1200 to 1300 feet long (Figure <br />• 3B). This cliff, which incorporates several overhangs, <br />was closely examined throughout its length for rock art, <br />rock shelters, etc. The east side of the outcrop, which <br />dips sharply eastward, could be examined with binoculars <br />only, since it could not be safely traversed without climbing <br />gear (Figure 3A). <br />The remainder of the survey area (approximately 108 acres), <br />was almost entirely covered with dense oak brush, the <br />latter being virtually inpenetrable. The areas of oa4; <br />brush cover have an understory of shrubs and dense grasses, <br />providing 1008 ground cover. Low profile cultural resources <br />(such as lithic sites) are virtually undetectable under <br />this ground cover. However, several widely spaced (up <br />to 50 m) contour transects were walked through those areas <br />with the least dense oak brush. Several abandoned road <br />cuts in the W/12SW1/9 Section 6, up to one-third mile <br />in length and running northeast/southwest, were also walked. <br />These cuts provided cutbank exposures up to one meter <br />deep. Also, aspen trees were closely examined for graffiti <br />more than 50 years old. This methodology is believed <br />to have ensured adequate inventory coverage of the project <br />area, since it allowed for the study of places with liigl~ <br />cultural resources potential, such as valleys, ridgetops, <br />rock overhangs, aspen groves, and gentle open slopes. <br />• Those areas which were surveyed only by several opportunistic <br />transects are considered to have low potential for cultural <br />resources, because of their steepness. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.