Laserfiche WebLink
- Tllt GEU LOGICAL I\TtK YKt1A1 IU:\ OF BELL LOGJ - <br />There are many examples of radio~e sandstones <br />that may be quoted. The fine-grained mica sands of the <br />North Sea (Nyberg eral., 1978) aze a typical, well-known <br />example (Figure 7:17). Some marine sands contain <br />glauconite and, if the concenvations are sufficiently high, <br />render the sands radioactive (Figure 7.18). in fact <br />radioactive sandstones are Far more common than real- <br />ized. Arkoses are radioactive by definition (Table 7.16). <br />Thorium, as previously described, is present in heavy- <br />mineral suites. Placer silts (concentrations of heavy <br />minerals) are frequently radioactive, producing a spiky <br />aspect to the gamma ray log (Figure 7.19). However, this <br />is the only case, and in general detrital grain mdioactivity <br />is caused by potassium (Table 7.16). <br />For sandstone reservoir studies, identifying clay as <br />opposed to non-clay radioactive elements is important. <br />25 <br />E <br />r <br />n <br />0 <br />0 <br />50 <br />Neglecting radioactive stone intervals as being <br />shales means missing essential reservoir. The fact [ha[ <br />only potassium should be causing detrital mineral <br />radioactivity in sandstones (e.g. Table 7.15) is used in the <br />interpretation of the spectral gamma ray log to separate <br />shale mdioactivity from detrital grain radioactivity (see <br />befoty, 'Quantitative uses of the specVal gamma ray'). <br />Radioactivity in carbanares <br />Carbonates in their pure state are not radioactive and this <br />aids their identification (Figure 7.1). Nonetheless, in <br />certain facies, carbonates contain organic matter and this <br />is frequently mdioactive due to uranium. This is certainly <br />the case in the example given (Figure 7.20) and it is pro- <br />posed (Hassan, 1973) that pure carbonate radioactivity is <br />due only to uranium. Shaly carbonates will show the <br />presence of potassium and thorium. <br />(7 y <br />O o <br />J rT <br />0 n <br />0 <br />H > <br />W n <br />a ~- <br />quartz 65% <br />le ltlspar 4% <br />clay [5% <br />medium sand (3S0µ) <br />quartz 50% <br />mica 20% <br />clay 20% <br />pyrite 5% <br />v. line sand (1O0µ) <br />quartz 56% <br />leldspar 6% <br />clay 76% <br />garnet [0% <br />coarse sand (1O00µ) <br />N <br />W <br />m <br />Figure 7.17 Radioactive sand, the 'mica sands' of the North Sea Jurassic. They ate fine-grained shallow marine sandstones with <br />perhaps 209c clay but IS - 3090 mica, mainly muscovite, which causes the radioactiviry. <br />Table 7.16 Radioactivity in sandstones. <br />Species !\lineral Radioactive <br />element <br />Mica sand Muscovite/biotite 'eK <br />Glauconitic sand Glauconite '0K <br />Arkose Potassic feldspar i0K <br />Placer silt Heavy minerals Th <br />80 <br />Radioactivuy in evaporiles <br />The most common evaporites, such as sa][ and anhydrite, <br />give extremely and abnormally low values on the gamma <br />ray log. However, the high radioactivity in some evapor- <br />ates caused by potassium content has already been <br />mentioned (Table 7.9). The log example shows a typical <br />aspect of this ecaporite radioactivity. Frequently there are <br />extreme contrasts between the potassium and non- <br />potassium-bearing zones (Figure 7.21). Volumetrically, <br />potassium rich evaporates are rare. <br />: ~ :, <br />0 50 100 150 <br />