My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE128469
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE128469
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:25:36 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 6:11:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
Water Rights Investigation and Plan for Augmentation
Section_Exhibit Name
TAB 16 Attachment 16-A
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
September if a killing frost has not occurred. He said that normally the streamflow in <br />Dry Creek is sufficient to meet the irrigation requirements under the J.C. Temple Ditch <br />No. 2 until July I. He then supplements the diversions from Dry Creek with deliveries <br /> <br />I <br />from J.C. Temple Ditch No. I and from Emrich Reservoir. The fields on the east side of <br />Dry Creek have been machine-leveled for border irrigation systems. The fields are <br />divided into strips by parallel dikes or ridges. Each strip is flood-irrigated. The fields on <br />the west side of Dry Creek are irrigated with contour ditches. Tailwater is collected and <br />redistributed by other laterals or diverted from Dry Creek by the J.C. Temple Ditch <br />No. 2. <br />Diversion Records <br />The diversion records for the J.C. Temple Ditch No. I and storage records for <br />J.C. Temple Reservoir No. 1 for 1969 through 1986 were copied from the fifes of the <br />State Engineer. The diversion records are summarized in Tables 6 and 7. As described <br />earlier in this report, the Water Commissioner has not curtailed water diversions in the <br />Dry Creek basin and, therefore, has observed and recorded the diversion rates 2 to 12 <br />times per irrigation season. The records for 1977, 1978, 1982 and 1984 may be less <br />accurate than those for other years because the diversion rates were recorded only 2 to 3 <br />times during the season. The remainder of the diversion records agree with <br />Mr. Camilletti's statements. The recorded diversions averaged 378.9 acre-feet for 1969 <br />through 1986 and ranged from zero in 1978 to 616.8 acre-feet in 1976. The storage <br />records show that the reservoir usually filled in April or May, except in 1977, when the <br />records show that the reservoir did not fill. Storage volumes were recorded for 1969 <br />through 1973, 1975 through 1979, and 1981 through 1983. Diversions have not been <br />recorded for the J.C. Temple Ditch No. 2. <br />Soils <br />The soils irrigated under the Temple system include the Zultay Varient Loam and <br />the Spicerton Fine Sandy Loam. These soils are deep and well drained. They were <br />formed in alluvium derived dominantly from shale. The effective rooting depth ranges <br />from 40 inches to over 60 inches. Permeability is slow and ranges from less than 0.06 <br />inch per hour to 0.2 inch per hour. The available water-holding capacity of these soils is <br />high (1988, Schroeder). <br />Historical Consumptive Use <br />As used in this report, the consumptive water requirement is the volume of water <br />required during a specified time by vegetative transpiration and by evaporation from <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.