My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE128459
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE128459
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:25:35 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 6:10:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
Determination of Hydrologic Consequences, Simons, Li & Associates
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 07 Part 2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 64 <br />determination of these forces depends on the velocity, which is difficult to <br />determine since the riprap required has a diameter on the same order of mag- <br />nitude as the depth of flow. Bathurst (1979) describes a procedure for calcu- <br />lating velocities in mountain streams with large roughness elements. Using <br />his procedure and knowing the riprap diameter, a velocity was determined. <br />This velocity was then used to check the stability of the riprap. If the rip- <br />rap was calculated to be unstable, a larger size vas tried and the process <br />repeated. This procedure calculates the required riprap size for the side <br />slopes. The riprap size will therefore be more than adequate for the channel <br />. bed. Since both of these channels are steep with large floes, riprap lining <br />over the entire length is required. <br />L Gradation requirements of the riprap were described in Section 6.2.4 for <br />culvert design; the same criteria should be followed for the channels. in <br />r addition, both a gravel filter and filter fabric should be used. The gravel <br />' layer should be 0.5 feet thick and it is necessary to prevent puncturing the <br />filter fabrick. The filter fabric will provide maximum protection against <br />removal of fine material form the bed and side slopes on which the riprap is <br />placed. Figure 7 shows a typical channel cross section that is totally lined. <br />The riprap is extended outside the banks to prevent against failure if the <br />eater runoff should get out of the banks. <br />' Placement of riprap is also important. Riprap placement is usually by <br />dumping directly from trucks. If riprap is placed during construction of the <br />embankment, rocks can be dumped directly form trucks from the top of the em- <br />bankaient. Rock should never be placed by dropping down the slope in a chute <br />or pushed downhill with a bulldozer. These methods result in segregation of <br />sizas. c:ith damned ricrap there is a minima o` expensive hand work. Poorly <br />graded riprap with slab-like rocks requires more work to form a compact pro- <br />tective blanket without large holes or pockets. Draglines with orange peel <br />buckets, backhoes, and other power equipment can also be used advantageously <br />to place the riprap. <br />The first two alternatives for PM-CH-15 consider that the channel will be <br />graded on a uniform slope starting at the existing invert elevation of the Magpie <br />Creek diversion channel. Alternative 15-A uses side slopes of 2:1 and alter- <br />. native 15-H uses side slopes of 3:1. The uniform channel bed slopes were deter- <br />mined by setting the largest D50 size of the riprap equal to two feet. Riorap <br />sizes larger than this were considered unavailable. These tvo alternatives keep <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.